-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
3/3 Extend Windows Performance Counters Receiver to support counters with instances #1229
Merged
bogdandrutu
merged 1 commit into
open-telemetry:master
from
james-bebbington:windowsperfcounters-receiver-3
Nov 9, 2020
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ | ||
// Copyright The OpenTelemetry Authors | ||
// | ||
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); | ||
// you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. | ||
// You may obtain a copy of the License at | ||
// | ||
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 | ||
// | ||
// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software | ||
// distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, | ||
// WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. | ||
// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and | ||
// limitations under the License. | ||
|
||
// +build windows | ||
|
||
package windowsperfcountersreceiver | ||
|
||
func (pc *PerfCounterConfig) instances() []string { | ||
if len(pc.Instances) == 0 { | ||
return []string{""} | ||
} | ||
|
||
for _, instance := range pc.Instances { | ||
if instance == "*" { | ||
return []string{"*"} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
return pc.Instances | ||
} |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
20 changes: 20 additions & 0 deletions
20
receiver/windowsperfcountersreceiver/testdata/config-emptyinstance.yaml
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@ | ||
receivers: | ||
windowsperfcounters: | ||
perfcounters: | ||
- object: "object" | ||
instances: [""] | ||
counters: | ||
- "counter" | ||
|
||
processors: | ||
exampleprocessor: | ||
|
||
exporters: | ||
exampleexporter: | ||
|
||
service: | ||
pipelines: | ||
metrics: | ||
receivers: [windowsperfcounters] | ||
processors: [exampleprocessor] | ||
exporters: [exampleexporter] |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you think we should consider being able to collect certain counters from only certain instances in the config? Or would one do this by using different receiver configs? For example, a case where one is interested in collecting counterA and counterB from instanceA only, and counterA and counterC from instanceB only.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If I understand you correctly, this is supported, as per the example here and test here. You can achieve what you want as there's no limitation that you can only specify an
Object
once. Let me know if I missed something there.Aside: there's currently no validation to stop you setting up completely duplicate counters, although I did leave a comment here mentioning we should consider adding such validation in the future.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah yes, that's what I was referring to, thanks for pointing me to it!