Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[docs] Add status header for awsecscontainermetrics receiver #10442

Conversation

Frapschen
Copy link
Contributor

Description:
Add status header for awsecscontainermetrics receiver.

@Frapschen Frapschen requested a review from a team May 31, 2022 06:15
@Frapschen Frapschen requested a review from Aneurysm9 as a code owner May 31, 2022 06:15
@Frapschen Frapschen changed the title Add status header for awsecscontainermetrics receiver [docs] Add status header for awsecscontainermetrics receiver May 31, 2022
@mx-psi mx-psi added the Skip Changelog PRs that do not require a CHANGELOG.md entry label May 31, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@codeboten codeboten left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The change looks good, pinging @Aneurysm9 to confirm stability status

@djaglowski
Copy link
Member

@Aneurysm9, please take a look

@codeboten codeboten added the ready to merge Code review completed; ready to merge by maintainers label Jun 30, 2022
@codeboten
Copy link
Contributor

Re-opening to trigger CI

@codeboten codeboten closed this Jun 30, 2022
@codeboten codeboten reopened this Jun 30, 2022
@codeboten codeboten merged commit 0fe8c14 into open-telemetry:main Jun 30, 2022
@Frapschen Frapschen deleted the Add_status_header_for_awsecscontainermetrics_rc branch July 7, 2022 05:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready to merge Code review completed; ready to merge by maintainers Skip Changelog PRs that do not require a CHANGELOG.md entry
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants