Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Doc/mention Steps Stats in README #518

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 14, 2024

Conversation

L-M-Sherlock
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@L-M-Sherlock L-M-Sherlock added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Dec 14, 2024
README.md Outdated
These stats are helpful for fine-tuning your (re)learning steps to achieve your desired retention in the short-term reviews.

How your learning steps affect the intervals:
- If you firstly rate again, the interval is the 1st learning step.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • If your first rating for a new card is Again, the interval is the 1st learning step.
  • If your first rating is Again and the second one is Good, the interval is the 2nd learning step.
  • If your first rating is Good, the interval is the 2nd learning step.
  • If your first rating is Hard, the interval is (1st learning step + 2nd learning step) / 2.

README.md Outdated
- If you firstly rate good, the interval is the 2nd learning step.
- If you firstly rate hard, the interval is (1st learning step + 2nd learning step) / 2.

So the 1st recommended learning step is based on the stability of your cards where you rate again in the first review.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So the 1st recommended learning step is based on the stability of your cards where you press Again during the first review.

README.md Outdated

So the 1st recommended learning step is based on the stability of your cards where you rate again in the first review.

For the 2nd recommended learning step, the senario is more complex. It is based on the minimum of the stability of three kinds of cards:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

*scenario

README.md Outdated
So the 1st recommended learning step is based on the stability of your cards where you rate again in the first review.

For the 2nd recommended learning step, the senario is more complex. It is based on the minimum of the stability of three kinds of cards:
- S(Again Then Good): You firstly rate again and then rate good in a new card.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

S(Again Then Good): Your ratings are Again and then Good for a new card.

README.md Outdated

For the 2nd recommended learning step, the senario is more complex. It is based on the minimum of the stability of three kinds of cards:
- S(Again Then Good): You firstly rate again and then rate good in a new card.
- S(Good): You firstly rate good.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • S(Good): Your first rating is Good.
  • S(Hard): Your first rating is Hard.

README.md Outdated
- S(Again Then Good): You firstly rate again and then rate good in a new card.
- S(Good): You firstly rate good.
- S(Hard): You firstly rate hard.
- Because hard step is (1st learning step + 2nd learning step) / 2, 2nd learning step is 2 * hard step - 1st learning step. And hard step is based on S(Hard).
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • Because a Hard step is (1st learning step + 2nd learning step) / 2, the 2nd learning step is 2 * hard step - 1st learning step. And the Hard step is based on S(Hard).

@Expertium
Copy link
Contributor

@user1823 your feedback is welcome as well

@user1823
Copy link
Contributor

Looks good enough to me.

@L-M-Sherlock L-M-Sherlock merged commit b3099d4 into main Dec 14, 2024
2 checks passed
@L-M-Sherlock L-M-Sherlock deleted the Doc/mention-steps-stats-in-README branch December 14, 2024 12:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants