-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 20
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Doc/mention Steps Stats in README #518
Conversation
README.md
Outdated
These stats are helpful for fine-tuning your (re)learning steps to achieve your desired retention in the short-term reviews. | ||
|
||
How your learning steps affect the intervals: | ||
- If you firstly rate again, the interval is the 1st learning step. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
- If your first rating for a new card is Again, the interval is the 1st learning step.
- If your first rating is Again and the second one is Good, the interval is the 2nd learning step.
- If your first rating is Good, the interval is the 2nd learning step.
- If your first rating is Hard, the interval is (1st learning step + 2nd learning step) / 2.
README.md
Outdated
- If you firstly rate good, the interval is the 2nd learning step. | ||
- If you firstly rate hard, the interval is (1st learning step + 2nd learning step) / 2. | ||
|
||
So the 1st recommended learning step is based on the stability of your cards where you rate again in the first review. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So the 1st recommended learning step is based on the stability of your cards where you press Again during the first review.
README.md
Outdated
|
||
So the 1st recommended learning step is based on the stability of your cards where you rate again in the first review. | ||
|
||
For the 2nd recommended learning step, the senario is more complex. It is based on the minimum of the stability of three kinds of cards: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
*scenario
README.md
Outdated
So the 1st recommended learning step is based on the stability of your cards where you rate again in the first review. | ||
|
||
For the 2nd recommended learning step, the senario is more complex. It is based on the minimum of the stability of three kinds of cards: | ||
- S(Again Then Good): You firstly rate again and then rate good in a new card. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
S(Again Then Good): Your ratings are Again and then Good for a new card.
README.md
Outdated
|
||
For the 2nd recommended learning step, the senario is more complex. It is based on the minimum of the stability of three kinds of cards: | ||
- S(Again Then Good): You firstly rate again and then rate good in a new card. | ||
- S(Good): You firstly rate good. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
- S(Good): Your first rating is Good.
- S(Hard): Your first rating is Hard.
README.md
Outdated
- S(Again Then Good): You firstly rate again and then rate good in a new card. | ||
- S(Good): You firstly rate good. | ||
- S(Hard): You firstly rate hard. | ||
- Because hard step is (1st learning step + 2nd learning step) / 2, 2nd learning step is 2 * hard step - 1st learning step. And hard step is based on S(Hard). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
- Because a Hard step is (1st learning step + 2nd learning step) / 2, the 2nd learning step is 2 * hard step - 1st learning step. And the Hard step is based on S(Hard).
@user1823 your feedback is welcome as well |
Looks good enough to me. |
No description provided.