Enhance the robustness of analyze_logs.py

[zytx121]

Thanks for your contribution and we appreciate it a lot. The following instructions would make your pull request more healthy and more easily get feedback. If you do not understand some items, don't worry, just make the pull request and seek help from maintainers.

Motivation

Enhance the robustness of analyze_logs.py.
resolve #6933
resolve #6031
resolve #6644
Related issues: #1264, #4001, #4064, #875, #5860, #1261, #6429, #7040, #7358

Modification

Please briefly describe what modification is made in this PR.

BC-breaking (Optional)

Does the modification introduce changes that break the backward-compatibility of the downstream repos?
If so, please describe how it breaks the compatibility and how the downstream projects should modify their code to keep compatibility with this PR.

Use cases (Optional)

If this PR introduces a new feature, it is better to list some use cases here, and update the documentation.

Checklist

1. Pre-commit or other linting tools are used to fix the potential lint issues.
2. The modification is covered by complete unit tests. If not, please add more unit test to ensure the correctness.
3. If the modification has potential influence on downstream projects, this PR should be tested with downstream projects, like MMDet or MMCls.
4. The documentation has been modified accordingly, like docstring or example tutorials.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #7407 (b735667) into dev (c546b50) will decrease coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 95.23%.

❗ Current head b735667 differs from pull request most recent head 8021f62. Consider uploading reports for the commit 8021f62 to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              dev    #7407      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   63.46%   63.46%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         340      340              
  Lines       27527    27527              
  Branches     4648     4648              
==========================================
- Hits        17471    17470       -1     
  Misses       9131     9131              
- Partials      925      926       +1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	63.44% <95.23%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
mmdet/models/dense_heads/ssd_head.py	85.84% <ø> (ø)
mmdet/models/necks/fpn.py	94.66% <ø> (ø)
mmdet/models/detectors/yolox.py	28.57% <50.00%> (ø)
mmdet/datasets/pipelines/loading.py	48.41% <66.66%> (ø)
mmdet/datasets/api_wrappers/panoptic_evaluation.py	67.28% <100.00%> (ø)
mmdet/datasets/coco_panoptic.py	88.70% <100.00%> (ø)
mmdet/datasets/custom.py	63.93% <100.00%> (ø)
mmdet/datasets/pipelines/transforms.py	75.25% <100.00%> (ø)
mmdet/models/dense_heads/centripetal_head.py	20.00% <100.00%> (ø)
mmdet/models/dense_heads/corner_head.py	68.33% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 15 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c546b50...8021f62. Read the comment docs.