-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 50
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Nested attrs.define
dataclasses not serialized correctly when a subfield is also an attrs.define
dataclass marked with attrs.field
#643
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
623cd86
add better support for nested `attrs.define` style dataclasses
cody-mar10 72a5d1b
add tests for nested `attrs.define` dataclasses with and without defa…
cody-mar10 844f5b8
add bug fix for pull request `#641`
cody-mar10 b470ebc
fixed pull request number to `#643`
cody-mar10 8d5b125
Merge branch 'main' into nested_attrs_dataclasses
mauvilsa 9bd7fba
Merge branch 'main' into nested_attrs_dataclasses
mauvilsa 1a992c3
remove comments and rename `attrs` tests for consistency
cody-mar10 960daf2
moved `attrs.define` dataclass fix to `v4.35.1`
cody-mar10 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks somewhat unexpected. I would have guessed that the parsed value would be
Namespace(p1=1.23, subfield=None)
. But anyway, this is not related to this pull request so I would say to keep it like this for now. Probably this behavior will need to change for #287.