Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(docs): more SolverNet #2593

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 2, 2024
Merged

chore(docs): more SolverNet #2593

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 2, 2024

Conversation

ttarsi
Copy link
Contributor

@ttarsi ttarsi commented Nov 29, 2024

Adds more context about the problem we're solving to the SolverNet section, so users coming to that section have full context and don't need to read through the Learn section as well. Don't change the learn section though, it's good to have it there too.

issue: none

@ttarsi ttarsi requested review from cdevens1 and fabtreb November 29, 2024 16:37
@ttarsi ttarsi enabled auto-merge (squash) November 29, 2024 16:37
Copy link

Docs preview complete 🚀 see it here: https://omni-n44suglhg-omni-engineering.vercel.app


1. Build applications on a single chain.
2. Don't worry about finality, solvers do that.
3. Build on a single chain.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What's the diff between 1 and 3?

@ttarsi ttarsi merged commit 6e0ca93 into main Dec 2, 2024
21 checks passed
@ttarsi ttarsi deleted the tt/docs-2 branch December 2, 2024 22:04
chmllr pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2024
Adds more context about the problem we're solving to the SolverNet
section, so users coming to that section have full context and don't
need to read through the `Learn` section as well. Don't change the learn
section though, it's good to have it there too.

issue: none
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants