Cap pytest to 2.7.3 #4194
Merged
Cap pytest to 2.7.3 #4194
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
As it looks lie pytest 2.8.0 is causing some issues with our usage of pytest.deprecatedcall(), this commit is forcing an earlier version of pytest to be installed on Travis rather than downloading the latest.
|
Diff looks good to me, worth a try! |
|
fine by me |
|
--rebased-to #4196 |
This was referenced Sep 21, 2015
Merged
Merged
|
Note this seems to have been reported upstream as a bug - see pytest-dev/pytest#1037. |
Merged
5 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As it looks like pytest 2.8.0 is causing some issues with our usage of
pytest.deprecated_call()in Python unit tests, this commit is forcing an earlier version of pytest to be installed on Travis rather than downloading the latest.To test this PR, check Travis is green. Note this PR is mostly targeted at keeping our PR validation via Travis ongoing. The reason of the regression should likely be investigated as a follow-up.
/cc @ximenesuk @aleksandra-tarkowska @will-moore @jburel