Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Use URLDecode.decode() that is compatible with pre Java 10 versions #1505

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 14, 2024
Merged

Use URLDecode.decode() that is compatible with pre Java 10 versions #1505

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 14, 2024

Conversation

arvindkrishnakumar-okta
Copy link
Contributor

@arvindkrishnakumar-okta arvindkrishnakumar-okta commented Jun 14, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Issue(s)

#1150 (comment)

Description

Tested with Java 8 runtime.

Category

  • Bugfix
  • Enhancement
  • New Feature
  • Library Upgrade
  • Configuration Change
  • Versioning Change
  • Unit or Integration Test(s)
  • Documentation

Signoff

  • I have submitted a CLA for this PR
  • Each commit message explains what the commit does
  • I have updated documentation to explain what my PR does
  • My code is covered by tests if required
  • I did not edit any automatically generated files

@arvindkrishnakumar-okta arvindkrishnakumar-okta changed the title Use URLDecode.decode() that is compatible with pre Java 10 versions Use URLDecode.decode() that is compatible with pre Java 10 versions Jun 14, 2024
@arvindkrishnakumar-okta arvindkrishnakumar-okta merged commit ca83314 into master Jun 14, 2024
8 of 9 checks passed
@arvindkrishnakumar-okta arvindkrishnakumar-okta deleted the ak_misc_fix branch June 14, 2024 15:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@duytiennguyen-okta duytiennguyen-okta duytiennguyen-okta approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@arvindkrishnakumar-okta @duytiennguyen-okta