-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
better serialization #53
Conversation
waiting for #45 |
working, just needs to have some tests for serialization failing. It would also be nice to have a serializeTo where you pass a map of the given type (and check existing key for that) |
I'm happy with this. LGTM |
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ import ops.typeSets._ | |||
Cannot parse fields | |||
${PS} | |||
from a Map[String, ${V}]. | |||
Probably you haven't provided property parsers for all properties involved. | |||
Probably you haven't provided property parsers for all properties in ${PS}. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If PS
is large, this won't look not nice
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fair enough,changing it
merging |
Same as in #45, we need record serialization to
Map[String,V]
with a couple of possible errors:V