Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs(README): update examples to use ESM #611

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 19, 2024
Merged

Conversation

wolfy1339
Copy link
Member

Resolves #ISSUE_NUMBER


Before the change?

  • The readme uses CJS syntax

After the change?

  • The README uses ESM syntax

Pull request checklist

  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been reviewed and added / updated if needed (for bug fixes / features)

Does this introduce a breaking change?

Please see our docs on breaking changes to help!

  • Yes
  • No

@wolfy1339 wolfy1339 added the Type: Documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Apr 15, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

👋 Hi! Thank you for this contribution! Just to let you know, our GitHub SDK team does a round of issue and PR reviews twice a week, every Monday and Friday! We have a process in place for prioritizing and responding to your input. Because you are a part of this community please feel free to comment, add to, or pick up any issues/PRs that are labled with Status: Up for grabs. You & others like you are the reason all of this works! So thank you & happy coding! 🚀

@wolfy1339 wolfy1339 merged commit 7392e4b into main Apr 19, 2024
9 checks passed
@wolfy1339 wolfy1339 deleted the update-readme-esm branch April 19, 2024 21:22
Copy link
Contributor

🎉 This PR is included in version 11.2.0 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

wolfy1339 added a commit that referenced this pull request May 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
released Type: Documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants