Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DO NOT MERGE: assess breakage due to QCheck.Print changes #27038

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

jmid
Copy link
Contributor

@jmid jmid commented Dec 6, 2024

This is an experiment to see if / how much the change in c-cube/qcheck#297 would break for QCheck users.

@jmid
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmid commented Dec 6, 2024

CI summary:

For the tezos/octez failures:

  • a bunch fail with unexpected injection on the node A, level = 1 / round = 2 - also observed in 4 packages from c-cube/qcheck at 0.22 #26196
    • octez-protocol-018-Proxford-libs.19.0
    • octez-protocol-018-Proxford-libs.19.1
    • octez-protocol-alpha-libs.19.0
    • tezos-baking-017-PtNairob.17.3
    • octez-protocol-017-PtNairob-libs.19.0
    • octez-protocol-018-Proxford-libs.18.0
    • tezos-baking-alpha.17.3
  • octez-libs.18.0 fails with
 Alcotest assertion failure
 FAIL expects 5 requests
 [error]    Expected: `5'
 [error]    Received: `4'
  • Two packages fail with a [error] the test is taking longer than 60 seconds:
    • octez-protocol-017-PtNairob-libs.18.0
    • octez-protocol-alpha-libs.19.0

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant