use x, y and dy when there is no rotate #682
Conversation
test multiline (with 1 empty line) document
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Doesn’t this break the layout of multiline text, since the tspans assume that x and y are relative to the transform, which is no longer present? That’s why I adopted the transform in the first place.
And perhaps more importantly, is there a reason to do this? I was trying to decide the answer to this question. I don’t know if there’s a compelling reason to do this (such as performance) and hoped you’d help me think that through.
Also I am reminded that the changelog will need to mention the change in behavior for dx and dy. If I’m not mistaken, in addition to the loss of units, they now apply before the rotation rather than after. This makes me wonder if we want something like the old dx and dy in addition to the new one?
|
In my test notebook https://observablehq.com/@fil/test-text-multiline-677 it seems to work, but maybe there's a case I didn't see? (I don't have a strong opinion on transform vs x/y, I must say.) [THE CHOIR: YES, THERE WAS SOMETHING HE DIDN'T SEE] |
|
Okay, how strange. I must have gotten confused in my implementation. Thanks! |
* multiline text * lineHeight option * skip empty lines * use x, y and dy when there is no rotate (#682) * use x, y and dy when there is no rotate test multiline (with 1 empty line) document * use selection.call to branch * remove duplicate test Co-authored-by: Mike Bostock <[email protected]> * minimize diff * fix choropleth label alignment * more test fixes * tweak wheel example * Update README * Update README * Update README Co-authored-by: Philippe Rivière <[email protected]>
test multiline (with 1 empty line)
document