-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 115
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Clean up non-tm backends removal #1870
Comments
Since there is a non-trivial amount of inter-dependency between components and the consensus implementation, my thought here is:
The only component that isn't concretely tied to all other components and the consensus layer is storage at this point. I think having a single flag that controls the backend selection for all of the linked components is the right thing to do, ie: |
All the nodes should have |
that'll be good. the tendermint stuff is really tightly coupled. I think yes on folding epochtime in, because all the other parts rely on it. our backend APIs don't fit well with tendermint's processing model so it'll be less awkward when we don't have to handle that level of mixing and matching |
|
The other parts of this are going into the time keeping cleanup I assume? |
yes (commented on the PR, forgot to also link here). The epochtime/time-keeping changes will be taken care of in: #1793 |
Some cleanup things todo, leftover by: #1806
backend
flags wherever we are left with a single backend (if not done in: ABCI committee scheduler #1748)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: