Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Dysfunctional meshing for binary masks #60

Closed
oanegros opened this issue Aug 16, 2024 · 3 comments
Closed

Dysfunctional meshing for binary masks #60

oanegros opened this issue Aug 16, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@oanegros
Copy link
Owner

As noted by youtube user @nanoastro on https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7YcflamP23M&lc=UgxO647bjKzWHUI64aV4AaABAg
Recommendation currently is to load binary masks as volumes and use the Surfaces or add a Volume to Mesh node in the geometry nodes panel of the volume if you do not want to load Surfaces.
I'll look into making the behaviour of the Surfaces tag not set a threshold, but still load surfaces, to see if this helps with getting this as surface-to-mesh, also will look into why the skimage marching cubes fails on this.

@oanegros
Copy link
Owner Author

scikit-image/scikit-image#7377 if the marching cubes gets out of memory, it cannot report it

@oanegros
Copy link
Owner Author

This is currently not easily fixable recommended is to either:

  • if it is a binary mask with multiple objects, first do connected components
  • load your mask as a volume and apply a volume to mesh node or keep the Surfaces ticked

@oanegros oanegros added the bug Something isn't working label Aug 21, 2024
@oanegros
Copy link
Owner Author

oanegros commented Oct 8, 2024

better catches for this in v2.0

@oanegros oanegros closed this as completed Oct 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant