-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 114
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feat/m static routes #468
Feat/m static routes #468
Conversation
@@ -162,6 +162,7 @@ func Provider() *schema.Provider { | |||
"nutanix_foundation_central_imaged_node_details": dataSourceFCImagedNodeDetails(), | |||
"nutanix_vpc": dataSourceNutanixVPC(), | |||
"nutanix_vpc_list": dataSourceNutanixVPCList(), | |||
"nutanix_static_routes": dataSourceNutanixStaticRoute(), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we need a singular datasource for this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is it possible ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also for plural datasources we should stick to one convention either : nutanix_datasource_types or nutanix_datasource_type_list for new datasources.
return resourceNutanixStaticRouteRead(ctx, d, meta) | ||
} | ||
|
||
func resourceNutanixStaticRouteDelete(ctx context.Context, d *schema.ResourceData, meta interface{}) diag.Diagnostics { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We need to discuss this. As you mentioned that we can delete the static route from UI.
c018180
to
9f2daa2
Compare
e4afd60
to
74a752c
Compare
No description provided.