Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
RFC: Redesign config structure #5
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
RFC: Redesign config structure #5
Changes from 3 commits
da43cc9
62d84fe
f99216d
f5298f0
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes, agreed about
[general]
. I'm definitely for more orgainization.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We can also think about adding a
on_enter.nu
andon_exit.nu
file right next to the config.toml.on_enter
andon_exit
config values don't scale past 1 line of code. Files (I think) would suit most users better.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This reminds me, I've been looking at the
fish shell
source code recently. I noticed that most, if not all, of their built in commands have cpp code but they also all have *.fish commands too. i.e. there'scd
ancd.fish
. I was thinking that this could be an approach we take with nushell in ourstdlib
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sounds cool. Is it something we need to consider when redesigning the config (and how configs should work)?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it's probably a broader conversation about
stdlib
and built-in commands in general. so, we can probably drop the discussion about it since it's not specifically related to config.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good. But I generally agree with your opinion. It would also allow us to prototype stuff faster :).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
my one wish for a
config
command set update is that we move totoml_edit
so that comments are respected and maintained. today, with our current config setting tools, comments are removed.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree. The current config code makes a lot of assumption. It will need some substantial rework, especially after accepting this RFC.