-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 79
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implement delegated voting #1252
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1252 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 61.26% 68.07% +6.81%
==========================================
Files 216 217 +1
Lines 18490 18558 +68
==========================================
+ Hits 11328 12634 +1306
+ Misses 6542 5235 -1307
- Partials 620 689 +69
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we need to differentiate GetStandbyValidators
from GetStandbyCommittee
in Blockchain
API. We'll have more members in standby committee soon.
There is no need to provide full interop context.
Closes #1206.
If a candidate was registered, then unregistered and then again registered, it's votes must not be lost.
It's not used since #1252.
Close #867 .
Close #1206 .
Tested voting CLI on single node via
getvalidators
RPC.