docs(webpack): Add docs for webpack ci deployment

[ndcunningham]

Changes

Now the Project Crystal is enabled by default we need to revise our webpack documentation.

Preview

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Updated (UTC)
nx-dev	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	Feb 7, 2024 5:10pm

[nx-cloud]

☁️ Nx Cloud Report

CI is running/has finished running commands for commit 97b8886. As they complete they will appear below. Click to see the status, the terminal output, and the build insights.

📂 See all runs for this CI Pipeline Execution

---

✅ Successfully ran 6 targets

• nx affected --target=e2e --base=9046eef903f660755df8d4498df5c159792e442f --head=97b8886e98a073c9e483ac18496adbaec99b534c --parallel=1
• nx affected --targets=lint,test,build --base=9046eef903f660755df8d4498df5c159792e442f --head=97b8886e98a073c9e483ac18496adbaec99b534c --parallel=3
• nx run-many -t check-imports check-commit check-lock-files check-codeowners documentation --parallel=1 --no-dte
• nx-cloud record -- nx format:check --base=9046eef903f660755df8d4498df5c159792e442f --head=97b8886e98a073c9e483ac18496adbaec99b534c
• nx documentation --no-dte
• nx affected -t e2e-macos --parallel=1 --base=9046eef903f660755df8d4498df5c159792e442f --head=97b8886e98a073c9e483ac18496adbaec99b534c

---

Sent with 💌 from NxCloud.

[isaacplmann]

Small changes.

Why do you say "we are working on a plugin for Vite"? @nx/vite already exists. Does it not have parity with @nx/webpack yet? What does it not do?

[ndcunningham]

Small changes.

Why do you say "we are working on a plugin for Vite"? @nx/vite already exists. Does it not have parity with @nx/webpack yet? What does it not do?

I think the plugin being referred to here is NxWebpackPlugin so it probably would be called NxVitePlugin which would contain some of the already existing functionality nxViteTsPaths() and also functionality that does not exists for vite generate package.json.

cc: @jaysoo

[isaacplmann]

I think the plugin being referred to here is NxWebpackPlugin so it probably would be called NxVitePlugin which would contain some of the already existing functionality nxViteTsPaths() and also functionality that does not exists for vite generate package.json.

cc: @jaysoo

I updated the text to make this more explicit and approved the PR.

[github-actions]

This pull request has already been merged/closed. If you experience issues related to these changes, please open a new issue referencing this pull request.