-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: added --install-strategy=linked #6078
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Vincent Bailly <[email protected]>
3caaf36
to
2f8a505
Compare
no statistically significant performance changes detected timing results
|
Did it run using How can we run these perf tests using linked install? Shouldn't we see performnace improvements here?
|
I'm not sure how automated performance tests used to detect regressions could be expected to know about a new flag in a PR and use it? That's not what that test is for. |
agree for regression this is good and doing the right thing. for this specific change we would love to see benchmark and perf suites results with new flag. How can i trigger that? |
@saquibkhan I have a benchmarks branch that will address this. |
31aba55
to
ea39f75
Compare
Co-authored-by: Vincent Bailly <[email protected]> Implements the RFC https://github.com/npm/rfcs/blob/main/accepted/0042-isolated-mode.md Packages are installed in node_modules/.store flat, and linked into the node_modules tree in depth, rather than hoisted.
I hope this works with workspaces... |
## Summary <!-- Ideally, there is an attached GitHub issue that will describe the "why". If relevant, use this section to call out any additional information you'd like to _highlight_ to the reviewer. --> _This is part of a [series](#4813) of PRs being spun off from [my WIP branch](lewisl9029#2) to get the Highlight web app ready for [Reflame](https://reflame.app/). Hopefully this makes things a bit easier to review, test, and merge. 🙂_ There were several places in the frontend codebase where we were importing from `react-router`, a transitive dependency, instead of `react-router-dom`, a direct dependency. This is often referred to as a phantom dependency, and can cause a number of issues, both in theory and practice: - We have a rule against importing `useParams` from `react-router-dom`, but that does nothing to protect against importing `useParams` from `react-router`. In fact, this was something I [had to fix](38a02f4#diff-5fd6e69a538cbc878adc5b71eb5d9a6d68cd53d6588689284f4ecd9506343681L49) as part of this PR. - Since the versions of transitive deps are not specified explicitly, they can easily change under our feet without us noticing and potentially cause us to import a different version than we were expecting, or can even inexplicably disappear altogether when seemingly unrelated deps change. The potential for spooky actions at a distance is greatly exacerbated in a large monorepo like we have here. The Rush.js folks did a great [writeup](https://rushjs.io/pages/advanced/phantom_deps/) on the perils of phathom dependencies, so I won't rehash all the details. - It's incompatible with stricter package management schemes like pnpm (and the one used by [Reflame](https://reflame.app/) itself, which was admittedly my primary motivation for this PR 😅) that don't expose non-direct dependencies to the resolution algorithm to begin with, specifically to combat the phantom dependency problem. All I did to fix this was to search & replace all references of `'react-router'` to `'react-router-dom'`. And to prevent this specific issue from happening again, I added `react-router` to our existing list of restricted imports in eslint. For a more thorough defense against phantom deps, we'll need to switch to something like pnpm, npm's new [`linked` install strategy](npm/cli#6078), or possibly yarn's [pnpm nodeLinker option](yarnpkg/berry#3338) for a less disruptive migration (though I have no idea if it does what I think it does). ## How did you test this change? <!-- Frontend - Leave a screencast or a screenshot to visually describe the changes. --> I ran `yarn turbo run dev --filter frontend...` locally and poked around the app. ## Are there any deployment considerations? <!-- Backend - Do we need to consider migrations or backfilling data? --> None that I can think of.
Hi! Could you more deeply explain how works Or there will be shared dependency cache, with links from packages |
Co-authored-by: Vincent Bailly [email protected]
Implements the RFC https://github.com/npm/rfcs/blob/main/accepted/0042-isolated-mode.md
Packages are installed in
node_modules/.store
flat, and linked into thenode_modules
tree in depth, rather than hoisted.