Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

What about the Filesystem API? #2

Open
stuartpb opened this issue Jul 8, 2015 · 2 comments
Open

What about the Filesystem API? #2

stuartpb opened this issue Jul 8, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@stuartpb
Copy link

stuartpb commented Jul 8, 2015

Isn't this, like, exactly what the Filesystem API spec is/was all about (providing a way to store arbitrary blobs in a domain-sandboxed location)?
@stuartpb
Copy link
Author

Link to the API spec in question - and I guess the real answer to my initial question is "it'd be great, if anybody was even considering bothering to implement it yet."

stuartpb added a commit to stuartpb/state-of-binary-data-in-the-browser that referenced this issue Jul 10, 2015
@stuartpb
Mention how there's supposed to be a better solution
d15c47d 
See nolanlawson#2
@stuartpb stuartpb mentioned this issue Jul 10, 2015
Closed
@nolanlawson
Copy link
Owner

See my comment in #3

BTW Mozilla makedrive actually does do a pretty decent job of reimplementing fs on top of IndexedDB.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@nolanlawson @stuartpb