Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

chore: remove unwanted print of Ok(<path>) in nargo compile #843

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 14, 2023
Merged

chore: remove unwanted print of Ok(<path>) in nargo compile #843

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 14, 2023

Conversation

TomAFrench
Copy link
Member

Related issue(s)

Resolves #

Description

Summary of changes

Removes unwanted print statement

Dependency additions / changes

Test additions / changes

Checklist

  • I have tested the changes locally.
  • I have formatted the changes with Prettier and/or cargo fmt with default settings.
  • I have linked this PR to the issue(s) that it resolves.
  • I have reviewed the changes on GitHub, line by line.
  • I have ensured all changes are covered in the description.
  • This PR requires documentation updates when merged.

Additional context

@TomAFrench TomAFrench added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 14, 2023
Merged via the queue into master with commit 9af18d7 Feb 14, 2023
@TomAFrench TomAFrench deleted the remove-ok-print branch February 14, 2023 12:26
TomAFrench added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 14, 2023
@TomAFrench
Merge branch 'master' into update-clap
a9ad0a5 
* master:
  feat(nargo): add flag to verify created proofs (#737)
  chore: Add display for binaryop (#839)
  chore(ssa): per array memory map (#832)
  chore: remove unwanted print of Ok(<path>) in nargo compile (#843)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@kevaundray kevaundray kevaundray approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@TomAFrench @kevaundray