Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Binary solver for array equality constraints #520
Binary solver for array equality constraints #520
Changes from 6 commits
1424f86
cd78f4c
2320abd
b515216
94ae8ee
673d03f
719d8d2
146d1e9
e4166c0
32b7c21
d84d0f8
ff19a06
eb2555e
3d430db
ffe2674
52b90c9
aa7093d
e0e03ab
0574d0f
4d2e097
da10422
33b922d
395d1b0
75dee9d
3038995
26507f9
5062107
7114370
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
When is this branch triggered?
seems identify_binaries is called when it is not an arithmetic gate
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Indeed, but still the function is correct like this, using unreachable! would make it fit for the current use and less versatile.