chore: document noir_wasm

[Thunkar]

Problem

Resolves #4137

Summary

Added using typedoc, better comments and improved readme.

Check one:

• No documentation needed.
• Documentation included in this PR.
• [Exceptional Case] Documentation to be submitted in a separate PR.

PR Checklist*

• I have tested the changes locally.
• I have formatted the changes with Prettier and/or cargo fmt on default settings.

[github-actions]

🚀 Deployed on https://65c4a18877850200a56abdd5--noir-docs.netlify.app

[signorecello]

Probably at this point you feel the Typedoc pain. It's a particular pain, it hits all the head homogeneously, with great intensity.

But... I'd like it to look like the other packages, which should be achievable by replicating the way they're documented.

I can pick this up if you need it, my head already stopped hurting from the Typedoc pain from a few months ago

[signorecello]

This needs a bit more work to achieve the same formatting as the other two JS packages

[signorecello]

This needs a bit more work to achieve the same formatting as the other two JS packages

[Thunkar]

@signorecello not sure what you mean by "same formatting", sorry...

I think the only difference is that I added the README.md on the "front page" to slightly document usage?. From what I see, types and functions use the same formatting, the only potential problem I see is that we export CompilationResult as a union type, but the members of said union are not exported and therefore not documented.

Please let me know, I would like to improve this!

[signorecello]

Looks great now! Thank you!