Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement Eq trait on BoundedVec #4827

Closed
LogvinovLeon opened this issue Apr 17, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #4830
Closed

Implement Eq trait on BoundedVec #4827

LogvinovLeon opened this issue Apr 17, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #4830
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@LogvinovLeon
Copy link
Contributor

Problem

I have a function that returns BoundedVec and I want to write a test for it, but can't use assert_eq because BoundedVec does not implement Eq

Happy Case

assert_eq works on BoundedVec

Project Impact

Nice-to-have

Impact Context

No response

Workaround

Yes

Workaround Description

Compare manually field-by-field

Additional Context

No response

Would you like to submit a PR for this Issue?

None

Support Needs

No response

@LogvinovLeon LogvinovLeon added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 17, 2024
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to 📋 Backlog in Noir Apr 17, 2024
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Apr 17, 2024
# Description

## Problem\*

Resolves #4827 

## Summary\*

We're currently not implementing the `Eq` trait on `BoundedVec`, which
is added in this PR.

I've opted for ignoring differences in the storage array past `len` as
while it's not possible to have non-zeroed entries past this index if
you use the proper interface, it's possible to construct `BoundedVec`s
for which this is not the case. Once we allow proper encapsulation of
the internal state then we could simply check that the underlying
storage is equal.

## Additional Context



## Documentation\*

Check one:
- [x] No documentation needed.
- [ ] Documentation included in this PR.
- [ ] **[For Experimental Features]** Documentation to be submitted in a
separate PR.

# PR Checklist\*

- [x] I have tested the changes locally.
- [x] I have formatted the changes with [Prettier](https://prettier.io/)
and/or `cargo fmt` on default settings.

---------

Co-authored-by: jfecher <[email protected]>
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from 📋 Backlog to ✅ Done in Noir Apr 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant