-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
tools: print stderr on bad test.py vmArch check #6786
Merged
Fishrock123
merged 1 commit into
nodejs:master
from
Fishrock123:print-stderr-on-test.py-fail
May 19, 2016
Merged
tools: print stderr on bad test.py vmArch check #6786
Fishrock123
merged 1 commit into
nodejs:master
from
Fishrock123:print-stderr-on-test.py-fail
May 19, 2016
+1
−0
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
LGTM |
1 similar comment
LGTM |
This makes it so you can see why the check fails if it does. Typically that sort of thing can happen if you are modifying bootstrapping or `process`. PR-URL: nodejs#6786 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Fishrock123
force-pushed
the
print-stderr-on-test.py-fail
branch
from
May 19, 2016 13:54
524e413
to
4babe65
Compare
Fishrock123
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 23, 2016
This makes it so you can see why the check fails if it does. Typically that sort of thing can happen if you are modifying bootstrapping or `process`. PR-URL: #6786 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
rvagg
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 2, 2016
This makes it so you can see why the check fails if it does. Typically that sort of thing can happen if you are modifying bootstrapping or `process`. PR-URL: #6786 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
@Fishrock123 lts? |
@thealphanerd Wouldn't be a bad idea, we're unlikely to encounter it's usefulness there, but in the event we do, well, you'd have to manually put this in to see what's going on. Otherwise effects nothing, not even the CI. |
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 11, 2016
This makes it so you can see why the check fails if it does. Typically that sort of thing can happen if you are modifying bootstrapping or `process`. PR-URL: #6786 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 11, 2016
This makes it so you can see why the check fails if it does. Typically that sort of thing can happen if you are modifying bootstrapping or `process`. PR-URL: #6786 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 12, 2016
This makes it so you can see why the check fails if it does. Typically that sort of thing can happen if you are modifying bootstrapping or `process`. PR-URL: #6786 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 12, 2016
This makes it so you can see why the check fails if it does. Typically that sort of thing can happen if you are modifying bootstrapping or `process`. PR-URL: #6786 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Merged
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 14, 2016
This makes it so you can see why the check fails if it does. Typically that sort of thing can happen if you are modifying bootstrapping or `process`. PR-URL: #6786 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 14, 2016
This makes it so you can see why the check fails if it does. Typically that sort of thing can happen if you are modifying bootstrapping or `process`. PR-URL: #6786 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Checklist
Affected core subsystem(s)
tools,test
Description of change
This makes it so you can see why the check fails if it does.
Typically that sort of thing can happen if you are modifying
bootstrapping or process. (Which I seem to do a lot.)
Note: running the CI here is pointless because this isn't triggerable via CI..