Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

tools: print stderr on bad test.py vmArch check #6786

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 19, 2016

Conversation

Fishrock123
Copy link
Contributor

@Fishrock123 Fishrock123 commented May 16, 2016

Checklist
  • tests and code linting passes
  • the commit message follows commit guidelines
Affected core subsystem(s)

tools,test

Description of change

This makes it so you can see why the check fails if it does.

Typically that sort of thing can happen if you are modifying
bootstrapping or process. (Which I seem to do a lot.)

Note: running the CI here is pointless because this isn't triggerable via CI..

@Fishrock123 Fishrock123 added the tools Issues and PRs related to the tools directory. label May 16, 2016
@addaleax
Copy link
Member

LGTM

1 similar comment
@bnoordhuis
Copy link
Member

LGTM

This makes it so you can see why the check fails if it does.

Typically that sort of thing can happen if you are modifying
bootstrapping or `process`.

PR-URL: nodejs#6786
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
@Fishrock123 Fishrock123 force-pushed the print-stderr-on-test.py-fail branch from 524e413 to 4babe65 Compare May 19, 2016 13:54
@Fishrock123 Fishrock123 merged commit 4babe65 into nodejs:master May 19, 2016
@Fishrock123 Fishrock123 deleted the print-stderr-on-test.py-fail branch May 19, 2016 13:54
Fishrock123 added a commit that referenced this pull request May 23, 2016
This makes it so you can see why the check fails if it does.

Typically that sort of thing can happen if you are modifying
bootstrapping or `process`.

PR-URL: #6786
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
rvagg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 2, 2016
This makes it so you can see why the check fails if it does.

Typically that sort of thing can happen if you are modifying
bootstrapping or `process`.

PR-URL: #6786
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
@MylesBorins
Copy link
Contributor

@Fishrock123 lts?

@Fishrock123
Copy link
Contributor Author

@thealphanerd Wouldn't be a bad idea, we're unlikely to encounter it's usefulness there, but in the event we do, well, you'd have to manually put this in to see what's going on.

Otherwise effects nothing, not even the CI.

MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 11, 2016
This makes it so you can see why the check fails if it does.

Typically that sort of thing can happen if you are modifying
bootstrapping or `process`.

PR-URL: #6786
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 11, 2016
This makes it so you can see why the check fails if it does.

Typically that sort of thing can happen if you are modifying
bootstrapping or `process`.

PR-URL: #6786
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 12, 2016
This makes it so you can see why the check fails if it does.

Typically that sort of thing can happen if you are modifying
bootstrapping or `process`.

PR-URL: #6786
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 12, 2016
This makes it so you can see why the check fails if it does.

Typically that sort of thing can happen if you are modifying
bootstrapping or `process`.

PR-URL: #6786
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
@MylesBorins MylesBorins mentioned this pull request Jul 12, 2016
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 14, 2016
This makes it so you can see why the check fails if it does.

Typically that sort of thing can happen if you are modifying
bootstrapping or `process`.

PR-URL: #6786
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 14, 2016
This makes it so you can see why the check fails if it does.

Typically that sort of thing can happen if you are modifying
bootstrapping or `process`.

PR-URL: #6786
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
tools Issues and PRs related to the tools directory.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants