governance: simplified pure consensus seeking #677
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
If accepted we should also update the copied text for working groups in #599 |
|
+1 |
2 similar comments
|
+1 |
|
+1 |
|
+1. |
|
+1 |
|
That's a majority, and we've had a long time for comment, can a TC member merge please :) |
mikeal
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 4, 2015
This changes TC addition to a standard TC motion instead of requiring unanimous consent of all members. PR-URL: #677 Reviewed-By: Chris Dickinson <[email protected]>
|
Merged in 8ac8b76. |
This was referenced Jun 23, 2023
This was referenced Jul 6, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We should remove special cases where we break from consensus seeking in favor of pure consensus.
The reason the process has worked so well is the incentive to convince your peers which is not present in pure consensus. Breaking from it seems dangerous.