-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
doc: clarification for maxBuffer and Unicode output #6030
Conversation
TBH, it seems kind of pointless to me - most child processes will simply ignore it - and it's already perfectly possible to set an environment variable. I don't really see why this should be in core. |
Fair enough. What do you think about the docs change, however? |
The change to the documentation LGTM if you remove the reference to |
ba28b95
to
b693bab
Compare
b693bab
to
1f02970
Compare
@bnoordhuis ... updated so that it's just the documentation changes. Also cleaned up some errant line-wrapping issues and end-of-line-whitespace. PTAL |
LGTM |
1 similar comment
LGTM |
Clarify caveats on `maxBuffer` with regards to Unicode output. Refs: nodejs#1901
1f02970
to
b968cc3
Compare
Clarify caveats on `maxBuffer` with regards to Unicode output. Refs: #1901 PR-URL: #6030 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
Landed in ad2df3a |
@jasnell lts? |
Clarify caveats on `maxBuffer` with regards to Unicode output. Refs: #1901 PR-URL: #6030 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
Clarify caveats on `maxBuffer` with regards to Unicode output. Refs: #1901 PR-URL: #6030 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
Clarify caveats on `maxBuffer` with regards to Unicode output. Refs: #1901 PR-URL: #6030 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
@jasnell lts? |
+1
|
Clarify caveats on `maxBuffer` with regards to Unicode output. Refs: #1901 PR-URL: #6030 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
@jasnell not landing cleanly, would you like to backport? |
will do |
ping @jasnell |
Thanks for the reminder, will do this week. |
@jasnell added don't land. Feel free to still open a backport PR |
Pull Request check-list
make -j8 test
(UNIX) orvcbuild test nosign
(Windows) pass withthis change (including linting)?
test (or a benchmark) included?
existing APIs, or introduces new ones)?
Affected core subsystem(s)
doc
Description of change
Clarify caveats on
maxBuffer
with regards to Unicode output.Refs: #1901