Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

esm: handle more error types thrown from the loader thread #48247

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 1, 2023
Merged

esm: handle more error types thrown from the loader thread #48247

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 1, 2023

Conversation

aduh95
Copy link
Contributor

@aduh95 aduh95 commented May 30, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Refs: #48240

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Review requested:

  • @nodejs/loaders
  • @nodejs/modules

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added esm Issues and PRs related to the ECMAScript Modules implementation. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. labels May 30, 2023
@aduh95 aduh95 added author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. labels May 31, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label May 31, 2023
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/52019/

JakobJingleheimer
JakobJingleheimer approved these changes May 31, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@JakobJingleheimer JakobJingleheimer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Awesome, thanks!

The new test-cases seem a bit verbose; could they be DRY'd up with a loop (for (const valid of […]) and possibly for (const invalid of […]))?

lib/internal/modules/esm/worker.js
Comment on lines +51 to +54
if (status === 'success' || body === null ||
(typeof body !== 'object' &&
typeof body !== 'function' &&
typeof body !== 'symbol')) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nit

Suggested change
if (status === 'success' || body === null ||
(typeof body !== 'object' &&
typeof body !== 'function' &&
typeof body !== 'symbol')) {
if (status === 'success' || body === null ||
(typeof body !== 'object' &&
typeof body !== 'function' &&
typeof body !== 'symbol')
) {

@aduh95
Copy link
Contributor Author

aduh95 commented May 31, 2023

The new test-cases seem a bit verbose; could they be DRY'd up with a loop (for (const valid of […]) and possibly for (const invalid of […]))?

There are on the same structure than almost every other test cases in that file, that seems fine to me. IMO test code should be WET code, not DRY.

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/52026/

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/52032/

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/52033/

@aduh95 aduh95 added the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label Jun 1, 2023
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot removed the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label Jun 1, 2023
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot merged commit d28f1f1 into nodejs:main Jun 1, 2023
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Landed in d28f1f1

@aduh95 aduh95 deleted the loader-throw-funny branch June 1, 2023 10:08
This was referenced Jun 2, 2023
Open
Open
Open
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 4, 2023
@aduh95 @targos
esm: handle more error types thrown from the loader thread
3c7846d 
PR-URL: #48247
Refs: #48240
Reviewed-By: Geoffrey Booth <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Jacob Smith <[email protected]>
@targos targos mentioned this pull request Jun 4, 2023
Merged
This was referenced Jun 5, 2023
Open
Open
franciszek-koltuniuk-red pushed a commit to franciszek-koltuniuk-red/node that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2023
@aduh95 @franciszek-koltuniuk-red
esm: handle more error types thrown from the loader thread
9421c52 
PR-URL: nodejs#48247
Refs: nodejs#48240
Reviewed-By: Geoffrey Booth <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Jacob Smith <[email protected]>
@danielleadams
Copy link
Contributor

This is blocked by another PR that needs to be backported to v18.x because it references missing code.

@danielleadams danielleadams added the backport-blocked-v18.x PRs that should land on the v18.x-staging branch but are blocked by another PR's pending backport. label Jul 6, 2023
@aduh95
Copy link
Contributor Author

aduh95 commented Jul 9, 2023

For reference, backporting this is blocked until #44710 is backported.

Ceres6 pushed a commit to Ceres6/node that referenced this pull request Aug 14, 2023
@aduh95 @Ceres6
esm: handle more error types thrown from the loader thread
215acb4 
PR-URL: nodejs#48247
Refs: nodejs#48240
Reviewed-By: Geoffrey Booth <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Jacob Smith <[email protected]>
Ceres6 pushed a commit to Ceres6/node that referenced this pull request Aug 14, 2023
@aduh95 @Ceres6
esm: handle more error types thrown from the loader thread
f1e94fd 
PR-URL: nodejs#48247
Refs: nodejs#48240
Reviewed-By: Geoffrey Booth <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Jacob Smith <[email protected]>
targos pushed a commit to targos/node that referenced this pull request Nov 11, 2023
@aduh95 @targos
esm: handle more error types thrown from the loader thread
2bb6dfb 
PR-URL: nodejs#48247
Refs: nodejs#48240
Reviewed-By: Geoffrey Booth <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Jacob Smith <[email protected]>
@targos targos mentioned this pull request Nov 11, 2023
Closed
@targos targos added backported-to-v18.x PRs backported to the v18.x-staging branch. and removed backport-blocked-v18.x PRs that should land on the v18.x-staging branch but are blocked by another PR's pending backport. labels Nov 23, 2023
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 23, 2023
@aduh95 @targos
esm: handle more error types thrown from the loader thread
9938a8b 
PR-URL: #48247
Backport-PR-URL: #50669
Refs: #48240
Reviewed-By: Geoffrey Booth <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Jacob Smith <[email protected]>
@targos targos mentioned this pull request Nov 28, 2023
Merged
sercher added a commit to sercher/graaljs that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2024
@sercher
esm: handle more error types thrown from the loader thread
d5f0a76 
PR-URL: nodejs/node#48247
Backport-PR-URL: nodejs/node#50669
Refs: nodejs/node#48240
Reviewed-By: Geoffrey Booth <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Jacob Smith <[email protected]>
sercher added a commit to sercher/graaljs that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2024
@sercher
esm: handle more error types thrown from the loader thread
02041f8 
PR-URL: nodejs/node#48247
Backport-PR-URL: nodejs/node#50669
Refs: nodejs/node#48240
Reviewed-By: Geoffrey Booth <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Jacob Smith <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@ljharb ljharb ljharb left review comments

@MoLow MoLow MoLow approved these changes

@JakobJingleheimer JakobJingleheimer JakobJingleheimer approved these changes

@GeoffreyBooth GeoffreyBooth GeoffreyBooth approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. backported-to-v18.x PRs backported to the v18.x-staging branch. esm Issues and PRs related to the ECMAScript Modules implementation. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
8 participants
@aduh95 @nodejs-github-bot @danielleadams @ljharb @GeoffreyBooth @JakobJingleheimer @MoLow @targos