Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
make -J behavior default in test.py #40945
make -J behavior default in test.py #40945
Changes from 4 commits
d2244c1
c85a45b
1fe77c7
01db947
54996df
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This changes precedence of the
-j
and-J
flags, e.g. iftest.py -j 3 -J
was run andJOBS=2
then the old code would have overwritten thej
value fromJOBS
but the new code would leavej
unchanged.It's probably a rare edge case that both flags would be specified.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we keep it so
-J
effectively negates-j
, we'll have to update the help text to indicate that-J
doesn't quite have no effect at all.If we want to preserve that behavior, then perhaps the thing to do is print a warning when someone is using both
-J
and-j
? Or maybe print a warning every time-J
is used?I suspect, like you, that this is a rare edge case. I also suspect that it basically does not matter. Like, if we run with 2 processes instead of 4 (or the other way around) in a rare edge case....oh well?
@richardlau Would you be comfortable if we kept the behavior as it is in this PR but add a warning that gets printed if both
-j
and-J
are specified?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd be okay with that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is the behavior I've implemented in a fixup commit. PTAL.