-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
worker: use rwlock for sibling group #38783
Closed
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Since it is much more common to send messages than to add or remove ports from a sibling group, using a rwlock is appropriate here. Refs: nodejs#38780 (comment)
github-actions
bot
added
c++
Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++.
needs-ci
PRs that need a full CI run.
labels
May 23, 2021
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
jasnell
approved these changes
May 23, 2021
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
joyeecheung
approved these changes
May 24, 2021
addaleax
added
author ready
PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started.
and removed
needs-ci
PRs that need a full CI run.
labels
May 24, 2021
Landed in 46eb417 |
jasnell
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 25, 2021
Since it is much more common to send messages than to add or remove ports from a sibling group, using a rwlock is appropriate here. Refs: #38780 (comment) PR-URL: #38783 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <[email protected]>
danielleadams
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 31, 2021
Since it is much more common to send messages than to add or remove ports from a sibling group, using a rwlock is appropriate here. Refs: #38780 (comment) PR-URL: #38783 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <[email protected]>
Merged
Doesn't land cleanly on v14.x-staging. Blocked on #36345 (and maybe others). |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready
PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started.
c++
Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Since it is much more common to send messages than to add or
remove ports from a sibling group, using a rwlock is appropriate here.
Refs: #38780 (comment)