-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
doc: add performance notes for fs.readFile #36880
Closed
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
nodejs-github-bot
added
doc
Issues and PRs related to the documentations.
fs
Issues and PRs related to the fs subsystem / file system.
labels
Jan 11, 2021
Issue nodejs#25741 discusses a number of performance considerations for fs.readFile, which was changed in Node.js 10.x to split discreet chunk reads over multiple event loop turns. While the fs.readFile() operation is certainly slower than it was pre 10.x, it's unlikely to be faster. Document the performance consideration and link back to the issue for more in depth analysis. Signed-off-by: James M Snell <[email protected]> Fixes: nodejs#25741
jasnell
force-pushed
the
doc-fs-readfile-perf
branch
from
January 15, 2021 16:31
9bb9abb
to
92d731d
Compare
aduh95
approved these changes
Jan 18, 2021
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That may be off-topic, but what about fs.promises.readFile
? Otherwise LGTM.
Landed in 408e9d3 |
jasnell
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 18, 2021
Issue #25741 discusses a number of performance considerations for fs.readFile, which was changed in Node.js 10.x to split discreet chunk reads over multiple event loop turns. While the fs.readFile() operation is certainly slower than it was pre 10.x, it's unlikely to be faster. Document the performance consideration and link back to the issue for more in depth analysis. Signed-off-by: James M Snell <[email protected]> Fixes: #25741 PR-URL: #36880 Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]>
ruyadorno
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 22, 2021
Issue #25741 discusses a number of performance considerations for fs.readFile, which was changed in Node.js 10.x to split discreet chunk reads over multiple event loop turns. While the fs.readFile() operation is certainly slower than it was pre 10.x, it's unlikely to be faster. Document the performance consideration and link back to the issue for more in depth analysis. Signed-off-by: James M Snell <[email protected]> Fixes: #25741 PR-URL: #36880 Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]>
Merged
ruyadorno
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 25, 2021
Issue #25741 discusses a number of performance considerations for fs.readFile, which was changed in Node.js 10.x to split discreet chunk reads over multiple event loop turns. While the fs.readFile() operation is certainly slower than it was pre 10.x, it's unlikely to be faster. Document the performance consideration and link back to the issue for more in depth analysis. Signed-off-by: James M Snell <[email protected]> Fixes: #25741 PR-URL: #36880 Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]>
targos
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 1, 2021
Issue #25741 discusses a number of performance considerations for fs.readFile, which was changed in Node.js 10.x to split discreet chunk reads over multiple event loop turns. While the fs.readFile() operation is certainly slower than it was pre 10.x, it's unlikely to be faster. Document the performance consideration and link back to the issue for more in depth analysis. Signed-off-by: James M Snell <[email protected]> Fixes: #25741 PR-URL: #36880 Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]>
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
doc
Issues and PRs related to the documentations.
fs
Issues and PRs related to the fs subsystem / file system.
review wanted
PRs that need reviews.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Issue #25741 discusses a number of
performance considerations for fs.readFile, which was changed in Node.js
10.x to split discreet chunk reads over multiple event loop turns. While
the fs.readFile() operation is certainly slower than it was pre 10.x,
it's unlikely to be faster. Document the performance consideration and
link back to the issue for more in depth analysis.
Signed-off-by: James M Snell [email protected]
Fixes: #25741