Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: increase coverage for worker #36491

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Lxxyx
Copy link
Member

@Lxxyx Lxxyx commented Dec 12, 2020

test new Worker() with invalid NODE_OPTIONS
Refs: https://coverage.nodejs.org/coverage-743ee9d2c05efefe/lib/internal/worker.js.html#L179

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • tests and/or benchmarks are included
  • commit message follows commit guidelines

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the test Issues and PRs related to the tests. label Dec 12, 2020
@targos targos added author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. labels Dec 13, 2020
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Dec 13, 2020
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@aduh95 aduh95 added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Dec 15, 2020
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Dec 15, 2020
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Copy link
Member

@mhdawson mhdawson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@mhdawson
Copy link
Member

CI looks good landing.

mhdawson pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 18, 2020
test new Worker() with invalid NODE_OPTIONS
Refs: https://coverage.nodejs.org/coverage-743ee9d2c05efefe/lib/internal/worker.js.html#L179

PR-URL: #36491
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Juan José Arboleda <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
@mhdawson
Copy link
Member

Landed in 565663e

@mhdawson mhdawson closed this Dec 18, 2020
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 21, 2020
test new Worker() with invalid NODE_OPTIONS
Refs: https://coverage.nodejs.org/coverage-743ee9d2c05efefe/lib/internal/worker.js.html#L179

PR-URL: #36491
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Juan José Arboleda <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 1, 2021
test new Worker() with invalid NODE_OPTIONS
Refs: https://coverage.nodejs.org/coverage-743ee9d2c05efefe/lib/internal/worker.js.html#L179

PR-URL: #36491
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Juan José Arboleda <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
@danielleadams danielleadams mentioned this pull request May 3, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. test Issues and PRs related to the tests.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants