Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

internal: refactor to use more primordials #36140

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

aduh95
Copy link
Contributor

@aduh95 aduh95 commented Nov 16, 2020

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • commit message follows commit guidelines

@aduh95 aduh95 added author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. labels Nov 18, 2020
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Nov 18, 2020
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@aduh95 aduh95 added the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label Nov 19, 2020
@github-actions github-actions bot added commit-queue-failed An error occurred while landing this pull request using GitHub Actions. and removed commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. labels Nov 19, 2020
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Commit Queue failed
- Loading data for nodejs/node/pull/36140
✔  Done loading data for nodejs/node/pull/36140
----------------------------------- PR info ------------------------------------
Title      internal: refactor to use more primordials (#36140)
   ⚠  Could not retrieve the email or name of the PR author's from user's GitHub profile!
Branch     aduh95:main-primordials -> nodejs:master
Labels     author ready
Commits    1
 - internal: refactor to use more primordials
Committers 1
 - Antoine du Hamel 
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/36140
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott 
Reviewed-By: James M Snell 
------------------------------ Generated metadata ------------------------------
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/36140
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott 
Reviewed-By: James M Snell 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   ✔  Last GitHub Actions successful
   ℹ  Last Full PR CI on 2020-11-18T13:54:23Z: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/34452/
- Querying data for job/node-test-pull-request/34452/
✔  Build data downloaded
   ✔  Last Jenkins CI successful
   ℹ  This PR was created on Mon, 16 Nov 2020 23:09:37 GMT
   ✔  Approvals: 2
   ✔  - Rich Trott (@Trott) (TSC): https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/36140#pullrequestreview-533395778
   ✔  - James M Snell (@jasnell) (TSC): https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/36140#pullrequestreview-534528748
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   ✔  No git cherry-pick in progress
   ✔  No git am in progress
   ✔  No git rebase in progress
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Bringing origin/master up to date...
From https://github.com/nodejs/node
 * branch                  master     -> FETCH_HEAD
✔  origin/master is now up-to-date
- Downloading patch for 36140
From https://github.com/nodejs/node
 * branch                  refs/pull/36140/merge -> FETCH_HEAD
✔  Fetched commits as 275aa6845ea7..63bbbf57b02a
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[master f60270928c] internal: refactor to use more primordials
 Author: Antoine du Hamel 
 Date: Sun Nov 15 19:18:33 2020 +0100
 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
   ✔  Patches applied
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------- New Message ----------------------------------
internal: refactor to use more primordials

PR-URL: #36140
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott [email protected]
Reviewed-By: James M Snell [email protected]

[master bff8f031f7] internal: refactor to use more primordials
Author: Antoine du Hamel [email protected]
Date: Sun Nov 15 19:18:33 2020 +0100
2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
✖ bff8f031f7d02369a8aaadb823bfe98817f5d6c0
✔ 0:0 skipping fixes-url fixes-url
✔ 0:0 blank line after title line-after-title
✔ 0:0 line-lengths are valid line-length
✔ 0:0 metadata is at end of message metadata-end
✔ 1:8 PR-URL is valid. pr-url
✔ 0:0 reviewers are valid reviewers
✖ 0:0 Invalid subsystem: "internal" subsystem
✔ 0:0 Title is formatted correctly. title-format
✔ 0:0 Title is <= 50 columns. title-length

ℹ Please fix the commit message and try again.

https://github.com/nodejs/node/actions/runs/372812416

aduh95 added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 19, 2020
PR-URL: #36140
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
@aduh95
Copy link
Contributor Author

aduh95 commented Nov 19, 2020

Landed in 3e0194e

@aduh95 aduh95 closed this Nov 19, 2020
@aduh95 aduh95 deleted the main-primordials branch November 19, 2020 18:19
codebytere pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 22, 2020
PR-URL: #36140
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
@codebytere codebytere mentioned this pull request Nov 22, 2020
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 16, 2021
PR-URL: #36140
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 11, 2021
PR-URL: #36140
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
@targos targos removed the commit-queue-failed An error occurred while landing this pull request using GitHub Actions. label Sep 5, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants