meta: add issue template for API reference docs #32944
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
nodejs-github-bot
added
the
meta
|
/cc @nodejs/documentation @mcollina @codebytere for review please |
|
/cc @Trott as we may need to start linting these Markdown files |
jasnell
approved these changes
Apr 29, 2020
codebytere
reviewed
Apr 29, 2020
added 3 commits
April 29, 2020 21:17
Prior to this commit, there was no GitHub issue template guiding users to open issues about gaps in the API reference docs. Refs: #31123 Closes: nodejs/nodejs.org#2866
|
@codebytere, your feedback has been incorporated. The potentially unnecessary sections have been removed, which was made possible by slightly modifying the final section to allow for more free-form commentary. |
addaleax
approved these changes
Apr 30, 2020
addaleax
added
the
author ready
gireeshpunathil
approved these changes
Apr 30, 2020
codebytere
approved these changes
Apr 30, 2020
trivikr
approved these changes
May 7, 2020
addaleax
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 9, 2020
Prior to this commit, there was no GitHub issue template guiding users to open issues about gaps in the API reference docs. Refs: #31123 PR-URL: #32944 Fixes: nodejs/nodejs.org#2866 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Shelley Vohr <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <[email protected]>
|
Landed in 3226731 |
codebytere
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 11, 2020
Prior to this commit, there was no GitHub issue template guiding users to open issues about gaps in the API reference docs. Refs: #31123 PR-URL: #32944 Fixes: nodejs/nodejs.org#2866 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Shelley Vohr <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <[email protected]>
Merged
codebytere
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 7, 2020
Prior to this commit, there was no GitHub issue template guiding users to open issues about gaps in the API reference docs. Refs: #31123 PR-URL: #32944 Fixes: nodejs/nodejs.org#2866 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Shelley Vohr <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <[email protected]>
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Prior to this commit, there was no GitHub issue template guiding
users to open issues about gaps in the API reference docs.
Refs: #31123
Closes: nodejs/nodejs.org#2866
Checklist