-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
build: hard code doctool in test-doc target #29375
Conversation
This commit removes the usage of the CI_DOC variable in the test-doc recipe and specifies the doctool argument to tools/test.py explicitly. The motivation for this is that the build is taking longer time and this is mostly due to tests being run twice as the CI_DOC variable will be empty in most cases (when not using --without-ssl). This change was introduced with/after Commit 9039af8 ("build: skip test-ci doc targets if no crypto") and while I though it might make sense to change the setting of CI_DOC I not sure about the implications that might have to our CI environment. It currently looks like this: ifeq ($(node_use_openssl), false) CI_DOC := doctool else CI_DOC = endif Which is setting CI_DOC to doctool if there is no crypto support which not available. But perhaps this should be be the other way around, changing the order or updating condition to be true.
Re-run of failing node-test-commit-plinux (✔️) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Right, so it's currently running all tests when no crypto. Yes, that would slow it down some. :-)
I'd like to fast-track this as it does improve the build time. Please give a 👍 if you agree or if you disagree please remove the |
Even with crypto enabled, running the |
Landed in 25d59cf |
This commit removes the usage of the CI_DOC variable in the test-doc recipe and specifies the doctool argument to tools/test.py explicitly. The motivation for this is that the build is taking longer time and this is mostly due to tests being run twice as the CI_DOC variable will be empty in most cases (when not using --without-ssl). This change was introduced with/after Commit 9039af8 ("build: skip test-ci doc targets if no crypto") and while I though it might make sense to change the setting of CI_DOC I not sure about the implications that might have to our CI environment. It currently looks like this: ifeq ($(node_use_openssl), false) CI_DOC := doctool else CI_DOC = endif Which is setting CI_DOC to doctool if there is no crypto support which not available. But perhaps this should be be the other way around, changing the order or updating condition to be true. PR-URL: #29375 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Yongsheng Zhang <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: David Carlier <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
This commit removes the usage of the CI_DOC variable in the test-doc recipe and specifies the doctool argument to tools/test.py explicitly. The motivation for this is that the build is taking longer time and this is mostly due to tests being run twice as the CI_DOC variable will be empty in most cases (when not using --without-ssl). This change was introduced with/after Commit 9039af8 ("build: skip test-ci doc targets if no crypto") and while I though it might make sense to change the setting of CI_DOC I not sure about the implications that might have to our CI environment. It currently looks like this: ifeq ($(node_use_openssl), false) CI_DOC := doctool else CI_DOC = endif Which is setting CI_DOC to doctool if there is no crypto support which not available. But perhaps this should be be the other way around, changing the order or updating condition to be true. PR-URL: #29375 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Yongsheng Zhang <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: David Carlier <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
This commit removes the usage of the CI_DOC variable in the test-doc recipe and specifies the doctool argument to tools/test.py explicitly. The motivation for this is that the build is taking longer time and this is mostly due to tests being run twice as the CI_DOC variable will be empty in most cases (when not using --without-ssl). This change was introduced with/after Commit 9039af8 ("build: skip test-ci doc targets if no crypto") and while I though it might make sense to change the setting of CI_DOC I not sure about the implications that might have to our CI environment. It currently looks like this: ifeq ($(node_use_openssl), false) CI_DOC := doctool else CI_DOC = endif Which is setting CI_DOC to doctool if there is no crypto support which not available. But perhaps this should be be the other way around, changing the order or updating condition to be true. PR-URL: #29375 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Yongsheng Zhang <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: David Carlier <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
This commit removes the usage of the
CI_DOC
variable in thetest-doc
recipe and specifies the
doctool
argument to tools/test.py explicitly.The motivation for this is that the build is taking longer time and
this is mostly due to tests being run twice as the CI_DOC
variable will be empty in most cases (when not using --without-ssl).
This change was introduced with/after Commit
9039af8 ("build: skip test-ci doc
targets if no crypto") and while I though it might make sense to change
the setting of CI_DOC I not sure about the implications that might have
to our CI environment. It currently looks like this:
Which is setting CI_DOC to doctool if there is no crypto support which
not available. But perhaps this should be be the other way around,
changing the order or updating condition to be true.
@nodejs/build @nodejs/build-files
Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX), orvcbuild test
(Windows) passes