-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
worker: use special message as MessagePort close command #27705
Closed
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This is a property of the native object associated with the `MessagePort`, not something that should be set on the conceptual `MessagePort` that may be transferred around.
When a `MessagePort` connected to another `MessagePort` closes, the latter `MessagePort` will be closed as well. Until now, this is done by testing whether the ports are still entangled after processing messages. This leaves open a race condition window in which messages sent just before the closure can be lost when timing is unfortunate. (A description of the timing is in the test file.) This can be addressed by using a special message instead, which is the last message received by a `MessagePort`. This way, all previously sent messages are processed first. Fixes: nodejs#22762
These tests should be fixed now.
nodejs-github-bot
added
the
c++
Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++.
label
May 14, 2019
Trott
approved these changes
May 14, 2019
cjihrig
approved these changes
May 16, 2019
Landed in 9375088...6f55c53 |
addaleax
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 17, 2019
This is a property of the native object associated with the `MessagePort`, not something that should be set on the conceptual `MessagePort` that may be transferred around. PR-URL: #27705 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
addaleax
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 17, 2019
When a `MessagePort` connected to another `MessagePort` closes, the latter `MessagePort` will be closed as well. Until now, this is done by testing whether the ports are still entangled after processing messages. This leaves open a race condition window in which messages sent just before the closure can be lost when timing is unfortunate. (A description of the timing is in the test file.) This can be addressed by using a special message instead, which is the last message received by a `MessagePort`. This way, all previously sent messages are processed first. Fixes: #22762 PR-URL: #27705 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
addaleax
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 17, 2019
These tests should be fixed now. PR-URL: #27705 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
targos
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 18, 2019
This is a property of the native object associated with the `MessagePort`, not something that should be set on the conceptual `MessagePort` that may be transferred around. PR-URL: #27705 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
targos
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 18, 2019
When a `MessagePort` connected to another `MessagePort` closes, the latter `MessagePort` will be closed as well. Until now, this is done by testing whether the ports are still entangled after processing messages. This leaves open a race condition window in which messages sent just before the closure can be lost when timing is unfortunate. (A description of the timing is in the test file.) This can be addressed by using a special message instead, which is the last message received by a `MessagePort`. This way, all previously sent messages are processed first. Fixes: #22762 PR-URL: #27705 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
targos
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 18, 2019
These tests should be fixed now. PR-URL: #27705 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
4 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
(The first commit is cleanup from #27294, with which this is going to have conflicts anyway…)
When a
MessagePort
connected to anotherMessagePort
closes, thelatter
MessagePort
will be closed as well. Until now, this is doneby testing whether the ports are still entangled after processing
messages. This leaves open a race condition window in which messages
sent just before the closure can be lost when timing is unfortunate.
(A description of the timing is in the test file.)
This can be addressed by using a special message instead, which is
the last message received by a
MessagePort
. This way, all previouslysent messages are processed first.
Fixes: #22762
Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX), orvcbuild test
(Windows) passes