Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

doc: remove link prediction from STYLE_GUIDE.md #21031

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Trott
Copy link
Member

@Trott Trott commented May 30, 2018

Remove promise to eventually link an example document to show level-one
heading. The style guide has been fine without the example doc for a
long time. The statement is already clear. And the style guide itself is
an example. We don't link to examples of wrapping at 80 characters, for
example. There's no need to link just to show what a level-one heading
is. (And if level-one heading is unclear, then it may be preferable to
improve the terminology rather than to link to an example.)

Checklist

Remove promise to eventually link an example document to show level-one
heading. The style guide has been fine without the example doc for a
long time. The statement is already clear. And the style guide itself is
an example. We don't link to examples of wrapping at 80 characters, for
example. There's no need to link just to show what a level-one heading
is. (And if level-one heading is unclear, then it may be preferable to
improve the terminology rather than to link to an example.)
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations. label May 30, 2018
@Trott
Copy link
Member Author

Trott commented May 30, 2018

@richardlau
Copy link
Member

We also randomly have https://github.com/nodejs/node/blob/master/tools/doc/README.md, which is sort of an example and IMO should be merged with the style guide (or at the very least, shouldn't be in tools/doc).

@vsemozhetbyt vsemozhetbyt added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label May 30, 2018
@nodejs nodejs deleted a comment from refack Jun 1, 2018
Trott added a commit to Trott/io.js that referenced this pull request Jun 1, 2018
Remove promise to eventually link an example document to show level-one
heading. The style guide has been fine without the example doc for a
long time. The statement is already clear. And the style guide itself is
an example. We don't link to examples of wrapping at 80 characters, for
example. There's no need to link just to show what a level-one heading
is. (And if level-one heading is unclear, then it may be preferable to
improve the terminology rather than to link to an example.)

PR-URL: nodejs#21031
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Tiancheng "Timothy" Gu <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <[email protected]>
@Trott
Copy link
Member Author

Trott commented Jun 1, 2018

Landed in c524576

@Trott Trott closed this Jun 1, 2018
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 6, 2018
Remove promise to eventually link an example document to show level-one
heading. The style guide has been fine without the example doc for a
long time. The statement is already clear. And the style guide itself is
an example. We don't link to examples of wrapping at 80 characters, for
example. There's no need to link just to show what a level-one heading
is. (And if level-one heading is unclear, then it may be preferable to
improve the terminology rather than to link to an example.)

PR-URL: #21031
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Tiancheng "Timothy" Gu <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <[email protected]>
@MylesBorins MylesBorins mentioned this pull request Jun 6, 2018
@Trott Trott deleted the keflavik-4 branch January 13, 2022 22:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants