http2: general code cleanups #19400
Closed
http2: general code cleanups #19400
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Most of the inlines were leftovers from a much older design iteration and are largely pointless or counter productive.
Use of a MaybeStackBuffer was just silly. Fix a long standing todo Reduce code duplication a bit.
nodejs-github-bot
added
c++
addaleax
approved these changes
Mar 16, 2018
src/node_http2.cc
Outdated
| }; | ||
| session->MakeCallback(env->error_string(), arraysize(argv), argv); | ||
| Local<Value> argv = Integer::New(isolate, lib_error_code); | ||
| session->MakeCallback(env->error_string(), 1, &argv); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You may want to call this arg, since it’s not really a vector any longer :)
(ditto below)
mcollina
approved these changes
Mar 17, 2018
| @@ -283,13 +251,13 @@ Http2Session::Http2Settings::~Http2Settings() { | |||
| // Generates a Buffer that contains the serialized payload of a SETTINGS | |||
| // frame. This can be used, for instance, to create the Base64-encoded | |||
| // content of an Http2-Settings header field. | |||
| inline Local<Value> Http2Session::Http2Settings::Pack() { | |||
| Local<Value> Http2Session::Http2Settings::Pack() { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
is it ok to remove this inline directive here and in the other functions? Wouldn't this impact perf somehow?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@mcollina It’s not only okay, it’s more or less the correct thing to do.
This has a pretty good explanation. tl;dr: Compilers are generally better than humans at judging what functions to inline or not, and will gladly ignore this advice. However, inline does affect the linkage properties of a function, and so its primary use should be to mark functions that are defined in header files (outside of a class definition).
I just tested it with gcc, and the compiler output is the same before and after this commit, byte-for-byte.
jasnell
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 18, 2018
Most of the inlines were leftovers from a much older design iteration and are largely pointless or counter productive. PR-URL: #19400 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]>
jasnell
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 18, 2018
Use of a MaybeStackBuffer was just silly. Fix a long standing todo Reduce code duplication a bit. PR-URL: #19400 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]>
jasnell
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 18, 2018
PR-URL: #19400 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 20, 2018
Most of the inlines were leftovers from a much older design iteration and are largely pointless or counter productive. PR-URL: #19400 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 20, 2018
Use of a MaybeStackBuffer was just silly. Fix a long standing todo Reduce code duplication a bit. PR-URL: #19400 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 20, 2018
PR-URL: #19400 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 20, 2018
Most of the inlines were leftovers from a much older design iteration and are largely pointless or counter productive. PR-URL: #19400 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 20, 2018
Use of a MaybeStackBuffer was just silly. Fix a long standing todo Reduce code duplication a bit. PR-URL: #19400 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 20, 2018
PR-URL: #19400 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]>
Merged
|
@jasnell could you backport this to |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
/cc @addaleax @mcollina
Checklist
make -j4 test(UNIX), orvcbuild test(Windows) passes