Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

doc: added TC meeting minutes 2014-12-17 #178

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

rvagg
Copy link
Member

@rvagg rvagg commented Dec 17, 2014

Closes #163

@rvagg
Copy link
Member Author

rvagg commented Dec 17, 2014

Two outstanding items that need to be taken care of:

  1. Start discussion on working towards a roadmap, soliciting feedback from contributors and the community (just an issue for this for now will do)
  2. Communicate a issue-closing guidelines to contributors.

I'm noting them here because I don't have time to deal with them just yet!

@iankronquist
Copy link
Contributor

roadmap++
You guys are awesome! It would be great for the organization to have a very clear path forwards.

@bnoordhuis
Copy link
Member

LGTM with the caveat that I wasn't there and haven't watched the video yet. :-)

@piscisaureus piscisaureus reopened this Dec 30, 2014
rvagg added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 30, 2014
Closes #163

PR-URL: #178
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Bert Belder <[email protected]>
@rvagg rvagg reopened this Dec 31, 2014
@piscisaureus
Copy link
Contributor

@rvagg I landed this PR - why reopen?

@rvagg
Copy link
Member Author

rvagg commented Dec 31, 2014

@piscisaureus there's 2 items in the comments here that I still need to take care of, TODOs for me

@piscisaureus
Copy link
Contributor

Ok got it

* Rod & Isaac: It’s up to someone on TC (or elsewhere) to start coming up with a roadmap, or at least start the discussion.
* **Agreed to start a GitHub discussion on roadmap and soliciting feedback from the community.**
* Rod: in an open model, it’s up to TC and those with commit access to take the initiative to just close things, given enough warning and chance for discussion and better arguments.
* Isaac: builtins (like Blog of FileReader) are TC39 / WhatWG groups out there that are doing this at the language & V8 level and we pull from there. It should be straightforward to close those issues.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Blog of FileReader

Blob or FileReader?

@rvagg rvagg closed this Jan 12, 2015
minervapanda pushed a commit to minervapanda/node that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2016
boingoing pushed a commit to boingoing/node that referenced this pull request Apr 6, 2017
The snprintf API is not available with older versions of MSVC. Found by a CI run.
joyeecheung pushed a commit to nodejs/llnode that referenced this pull request Mar 29, 2018
eti-p-doray pushed a commit to eti-p-doray/node that referenced this pull request May 28, 2024
syg pushed a commit to syg/node that referenced this pull request Jun 20, 2024
eti-p-doray pushed a commit to eti-p-doray/node that referenced this pull request Aug 28, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants