Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: refactor test-repl-definecommand #17795

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

Trott
Copy link
Member

@Trott Trott commented Dec 20, 2017

The test was writing to both REPL input and output but only checking
output. Sending output to both streams seems like it was an error.

/cc @bmeck

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
Affected core subsystem(s)

test repl

The test was writing to both REPL input and output but only checking
output. Sending output to both streams seems like it was an error.
@Trott Trott added the test Issues and PRs related to the tests. label Dec 20, 2017
Copy link
Contributor

@maclover7 maclover7 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

SGTM

assert(/\n\.say1 help for say1\n/.test(output),
'help for say1 not present');
assert.ok(/\n\.say1 help for say1\n/.test(output),
'help for say1 not present');
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems to be a independent change. I do not really see why this should be changed?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I was trying to standardize on assert.ok() for tests, but I see I also missed one on another line. Anyway, yes, it's unnecessary, so I'll undo it.

@bmeck bmeck mentioned this pull request Dec 21, 2017
4 tasks
@Trott
Copy link
Member Author

Trott commented Dec 21, 2017

Trott added a commit to Trott/io.js that referenced this pull request Dec 21, 2017
The test was writing to both REPL input and output but only checking
output. Sending output to both streams seems like it was an error.

PR-URL: nodejs#17795
Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
@Trott
Copy link
Member Author

Trott commented Dec 21, 2017

Landed in c90b10d

@Trott Trott closed this Dec 21, 2017
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 8, 2018
The test was writing to both REPL input and output but only checking
output. Sending output to both streams seems like it was an error.

PR-URL: #17795
Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2018
The test was writing to both REPL input and output but only checking
output. Sending output to both streams seems like it was an error.

PR-URL: #17795
Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2018
The test was writing to both REPL input and output but only checking
output. Sending output to both streams seems like it was an error.

PR-URL: #17795
Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
@MylesBorins MylesBorins mentioned this pull request Jan 10, 2018
gibfahn pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 24, 2018
The test was writing to both REPL input and output but only checking
output. Sending output to both streams seems like it was an error.

PR-URL: #17795
Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
gibfahn pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 24, 2018
The test was writing to both REPL input and output but only checking
output. Sending output to both streams seems like it was an error.

PR-URL: #17795
Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
gibfahn pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 24, 2018
The test was writing to both REPL input and output but only checking
output. Sending output to both streams seems like it was an error.

PR-URL: #17795
Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
@MylesBorins MylesBorins mentioned this pull request Jan 24, 2018
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2018
The test was writing to both REPL input and output but only checking
output. Sending output to both streams seems like it was an error.

PR-URL: #17795
Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2018
The test was writing to both REPL input and output but only checking
output. Sending output to both streams seems like it was an error.

PR-URL: #17795
Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2018
The test was writing to both REPL input and output but only checking
output. Sending output to both streams seems like it was an error.

PR-URL: #17795
Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
@Trott Trott deleted the refactor-definecommand branch January 13, 2022 22:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
test Issues and PRs related to the tests.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants