tools: Implement automatic fix for no-let-in-for-declaration #16642
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
apapirovski
reviewed
Oct 31, 2017
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hi @starkwang, thanks for working on this! Could you expand the test in test/parallel/test-eslint-no-let-in-for-declaration.js to test the fixer (output prop)?
See a sample of how it works here https://github.com/eslint/eslint/blob/master/tests/lib/rules/arrow-body-style.js
starkwang
force-pushed
the
autofix-no-let
branch
from
ebda2cb
to
ae9b2c6
Compare
|
@apapirovski I've just added the test for fixer |
apapirovski
approved these changes
Nov 1, 2017
|
Basically LGTM, just note that automatic fixing can introduce bugs if another variable of the same name was declared within the function. |
|
@tniessen I think we can rely on code reviews for that. If the author does not notice it themselves after running |
gireeshpunathil
approved these changes
Nov 1, 2017
|
Landed in 04ffa36 |
apapirovski
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 4, 2017
PR-URL: #16642 Refs: #16636 Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <[email protected]>
cjihrig
pushed a commit
to cjihrig/node
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 6, 2017
PR-URL: nodejs#16642 Refs: nodejs#16636 Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <[email protected]>
Merged
3 tasks
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 19, 2017
PR-URL: #16642 Refs: #16636 Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <[email protected]>
Closed
gibfahn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 20, 2017
PR-URL: #16642 Refs: #16636 Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <[email protected]>
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Refs: #16636
Checklist
make -j4 test(UNIX), orvcbuild test(Windows) passesAffected core subsystem(s)
tools