deps: backport 6d38f89d from upstream V8 #13162
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
nodejs-github-bot
added
the
v8 engine
mscdex
added
the
performance
|
Yes. This definitely needs to land for 8.x. |
|
@fhinkel Okay, It might be safe enough to bump the version number for V8 5.8 but we will run into the same issue with 5.9. Regardless, I will add a bump for 5.8 to this PR and we can deal with 5.9 when we get there. |
fhinkel
approved these changes
May 23, 2017
fhinkel
approved these changes
May 23, 2017
Original commit message:
[turbofan] Boost performance of Array.prototype.shift by 4x.
For small arrays, it's way faster to just move the elements instead of
doing the fairly complex and heavy-weight left-trimming. Crankshaft has
had this optimization for small arrays already; this CL more or less
ports this functionality to TurboFan, which yields a 4x speed-up when
using shift on small arrays (with up to 16 elements).
This should recover some of the regressions reported in the Node.js issues
nodejs#12657
and discovered for the syncthrough module using
https://github.com/mcollina/syncthrough/blob/master/benchmarks/basic.js
as benchmark.
[email protected]
BUG=v8:6376
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2874453002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{nodejs#45216}
PR-URL: nodejs#13162
Reviewed-By: fhinkel - Franziska Hinkelmann <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: jasnell - James M Snell <[email protected]>
4 tasks
|
Landed in e51a201 |
addaleax
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 25, 2017
Original commit message:
[turbofan] Boost performance of Array.prototype.shift by 4x.
For small arrays, it's way faster to just move the elements instead of
doing the fairly complex and heavy-weight left-trimming. Crankshaft has
had this optimization for small arrays already; this CL more or less
ports this functionality to TurboFan, which yields a 4x speed-up when
using shift on small arrays (with up to 16 elements).
This should recover some of the regressions reported in the Node.js issues
#12657
and discovered for the syncthrough module using
https://github.com/mcollina/syncthrough/blob/master/benchmarks/basic.js
as benchmark.
[email protected]
BUG=v8:6376
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2874453002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45216}
PR-URL: #13162
Reviewed-By: Franziska Hinkelmann <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
jasnell
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 25, 2017
Original commit message:
[turbofan] Boost performance of Array.prototype.shift by 4x.
For small arrays, it's way faster to just move the elements instead of
doing the fairly complex and heavy-weight left-trimming. Crankshaft has
had this optimization for small arrays already; this CL more or less
ports this functionality to TurboFan, which yields a 4x speed-up when
using shift on small arrays (with up to 16 elements).
This should recover some of the regressions reported in the Node.js issues
#12657
and discovered for the syncthrough module using
https://github.com/mcollina/syncthrough/blob/master/benchmarks/basic.js
as benchmark.
[email protected]
BUG=v8:6376
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2874453002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45216}
PR-URL: #13162
Reviewed-By: Franziska Hinkelmann <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
jasnell
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 28, 2017
Original commit message:
[turbofan] Boost performance of Array.prototype.shift by 4x.
For small arrays, it's way faster to just move the elements instead of
doing the fairly complex and heavy-weight left-trimming. Crankshaft has
had this optimization for small arrays already; this CL more or less
ports this functionality to TurboFan, which yields a 4x speed-up when
using shift on small arrays (with up to 16 elements).
This should recover some of the regressions reported in the Node.js issues
#12657
and discovered for the syncthrough module using
https://github.com/mcollina/syncthrough/blob/master/benchmarks/basic.js
as benchmark.
[email protected]
BUG=v8:6376
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2874453002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45216}
PR-URL: #13162
Reviewed-By: Franziska Hinkelmann <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
3 tasks
|
@ofrobots safe to assume this is not to be landed on v6.x? |
|
Yep. This does not need to be back-ported to 6.x. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This fixes some of the regressions in #12657. Since upstream doesn't backport things other than bug / security fixes, we will have to float this patch on Node.js 8.x until V8 6.0 lands on
master.One problem here is that since 5.8 and 5.9 are still stable/beta, we cannot bump the V8 version number in our copy of V8. This might make reasoning about precise versions between us and upstream a bit tricky. (/cc @targos).
The fixup needed for the backport to V8 5.8 were fairly minimal.
Original commit message:
Checklist
make -j4 test(UNIX), orvcbuild test(Windows) passesAffected core subsystem(s)
deps:v8
/cc @nodejs/v8 @bmeurer
EDIT: CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/8242/
V8 CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-commit-v8-linux/710/