-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test, url: check the origin of the blob URLs #11426
Conversation
9ef8e3d
to
546005b
Compare
I did minor tweaks to make the diff less. |
@@ -42,7 +45,7 @@ function runURLTests(urltests) { | |||
var expected = urltests[i] | |||
if (typeof expected === "string" || !("origin" in expected)) continue | |||
test(function() { | |||
var url = bURL(expected.input, expected.base) | |||
var url = bURL(expected.input || expected.url, expected.base) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This part is not in WPT, and the test data format is different actually. I think we can simply move it to the bottom and leave the WPT part alone for the ease of syncing/upstreaming.
// Tests below are not from WPT.
const tests = require(path.join(common.fixturesDir, 'url-tests-additional.js'));
for (const test of tests) {
if (typeof test === 'object' && 'origin' in test) {
const url = new URL(test.url);
assert.strictEqual(url.origin, test.origin);
}
}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also these new data can be upstreamed to WPT, no need to block this PR though, we can remove the duplicates in url-tests-additional.js
if it's upstreamed and synced into url-tests.json
later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's right, like the some of the other tests. I will update it, thanks!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, I agreed on it. I will make a patch to WPT then.
Also these new data can be upstreamed to WPT
fbf17a3
to
5c43539
Compare
Related link: + nodejs/node#11426
Related link: + nodejs/node#11426
@watilde looks like this needs a rebase? |
5c43539
to
b310388
Compare
@addaleax Oh yeah, I was just doing that xD Also, I made a patch to WPT at web-platform-tests/wpt#4941 now. Once we get a merge the tests, I migrate them into node. |
Related link: + nodejs/node#11426
Related link: + nodejs/node#11426
Just to be clear, I don't think we have to wait for the upstream PR to be merged to land our own, but this one touches a unsettled section in the spec so I think better wait until that one is merged :). |
Related link: + nodejs/node#11426
Related link: + nodejs/node#11426
Related link: + nodejs/node#11426
Related link: + nodejs/node#11426
b310388
to
84aab33
Compare
The upstream PR was merged, and I've picked them into this PR |
@@ -50,3 +51,12 @@ function runURLTests(urltests) { | |||
|
|||
runURLOriginTests() | |||
/* eslint-enable */ | |||
|
|||
// Tests below are not from WPT. | |||
const tests = require(path.join(common.fixturesDir, 'url-tests-additional.js')); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This doesn't seem to be applicable anymore, now that the tests are moved to url-tests.js
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it's good to keep it since potentially a case can be added into url-tests-addition
sometimes and some test codes actually are still having it.
e.g.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we add a test into the other URL tests as well to use url-tests-addition
? We also can separate the patch from this PR :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe just wait until there are new tests added into url-tests-addition
? I am fine either way though.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, I will get rid of this part from this PR since the scope can be different
In the getter of the origin in URL, the URL that has blob protocol will be parsed in a function called "originFor". Add test cases into the url-tests-additional fixture to test that. Refs: web-platform-tests/wpt#4941
Still LGTM |
CI failures are unrelated. |
Landed in 39f7e72 |
In the getter of the origin in URL, the URL that has blob protocol will be parsed in a function called "originFor". Add test cases into the url-tests-additional fixture to test that. Refs: web-platform-tests/wpt#4941 PR-URL: #11426 Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Timothy Gu <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
In the getter of the origin in URL, the URL that has blob protocol will be parsed in a function called "originFor". Add test cases into the url-tests-additional fixture to test that. Refs: web-platform-tests/wpt#4941 PR-URL: #11426 Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Timothy Gu <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
In the getter of the origin in URL, the URL that has blob protocol will be parsed in a function called "originFor". Add test cases to the
url-tests-additional
fixture to test that.This test increases the coverage of internal/url.js:
The following lines will be covered:
node/lib/internal/url.js
Lines 1064 to 1073 in a196895
Checklist
make -j4 test
passesAffected core subsystem(s)
test, url