-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Mani #78
Closed
Manimalini opened this issue
Dec 5, 2014
· 0 comments
· May be fixed by olegnn/node#29, erdun/node#34 or saeedahassan/node#28
Closed
Mani #78
Manimalini opened this issue
Dec 5, 2014
· 0 comments
· May be fixed by olegnn/node#29, erdun/node#34 or saeedahassan/node#28
Comments
kunalspathak
added a commit
to kunalspathak/node
that referenced
this issue
Feb 26, 2017
1. We parse error stack in chakra_shim to make it simliar to that of v8. However we were missing the case if stack messages has `\n`. Fixed it. Fixes: nodejs#78 2. Fixed Error.captureStackTrace Since `chakra_shim.js` that patches `Error.captureStackTrace` runs under strict mode, it was not able to get caller information. Having caller information is much reliable in captureStackTrace than matching using `function.name`. Removed `use strict` and disabled eslint rule for `use strict`. This helped in matching caller exactly regardless of name of form `o.p.q` in `Error.captureStackTrace`. Fixes: nodejs#75 3. Added missing functions on StackFrame Added following missing methods on StackFrame: * getFunction * getMethodName * getTypeName * isConstructor * isToplevel * isNative Implemented `getFunction`. `getFunction` currently works if `.stack` is called from same callsite where `new Error()` or `Error.captureStackTrace()` was called. However currently we don't record and store the callstack when these functions were called and so we lose the information of `.caller` when called later while populating `e.stack`. If we save the callstack, we would be holding references to all the functions in the callstack which doesn't seem right. I have added a TODO to solve this, but wanted to send this out so we get better coverage on node compatibility. Fixes : nodejs#70 PR-URL: nodejs/node-chakracore#85 Reviewed-By: Jianchun Xu <[email protected]>
This was referenced May 26, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: