Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add simulation app, implement e2e tests #1

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Oct 31, 2024
Merged

Conversation

boojamya
Copy link
Member

@boojamya boojamya commented Oct 30, 2024

This PR mocks up a simulation image (simd). This binary image is then used in an end to end test.

This test will also run as a GitHub action for PR's.

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • Introduced end-to-end testing capabilities with a new workflow for automated testing.
    • Added CLI commands for updating gas prices and managing transactions.
    • Implemented a structured configuration for the SimApp, enhancing modular functionality.
    • Established a new testing environment setup for end-to-end tests, improving test reliability.
    • Added new utility functions for managing token transfers and querying gas prices.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved transaction fee handling logic to optimize performance.
  • Documentation

    • Updated configuration files to better outline module functionalities and dependencies.
  • Chores

    • Added new entries to .gitignore to exclude unnecessary files from version control.
    • Updated go.mod files to manage dependencies effectively across modules.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 30, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces a comprehensive set of changes to enhance the functionality of a Cosmos SDK application. Key additions include a new GitHub Actions workflow for end-to-end testing, updates to the .gitignore file, modifications to the Makefile, and the introduction of several new Go files for transaction handling, testing, and application setup. The changes also establish a structured configuration for the application, integrating various modules and dependencies, while improving command-line interface capabilities and transaction fee management.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.github/workflows/e2e-tests.yaml New workflow for end-to-end testing with jobs: build, prepare, and test.
.gitignore Added entries to ignore build/ directory and files matching debug_container.*.
Makefile Added new targets: build, local-image, test-e2e; updated .PHONY and all targets.
ante.go Modified TxFeeChecker logic for fee bypass checks to improve control flow.
client/cli/tx.go Introduced CLI commands for updating gas prices with error handling.
e2e/chains.yaml Added configuration for noble-globalfee-simd with Dockerfile and build directory settings.
e2e/globalfee_test.go New end-to-end test for global fee functionality with various scenarios.
e2e/go.mod New Go module file specifying dependencies for the e2e tests.
e2e/setup.go Introduced setup functionality for E2E testing environment with ChainWrapper.
e2e/utils.go Added utility functions for sending tokens with fees and querying gas prices.
go.mod Updated to add github.com/spf13/cobra dependency, removing it from indirect requirements.
module.go Enhanced CLI functionality with new command methods and updated comments.
simapp/Makefile Updated to dynamically determine version and commit information for builds.
simapp/app.go Introduced SimApp structure with various components and initialization logic.
simapp/app.yaml New configuration file detailing modules and their settings within the application.
simapp/export.go Added ExportAppStateAndValidators method for exporting application state and validators.
simapp/go.mod New module file specifying dependencies for simapp.
simapp/simd/cmd/commands.go Established CLI for application management with various subcommands.
simapp/simd/cmd/root.go Introduced root command for simd application with configuration and context setup.
simapp/simd/main.go Established entry point for the application with address prefix configurations.

Poem

🐇 In a world of code, we hop with glee,
New tests and commands, oh what a spree!
With Docker and Go, our paths intertwine,
Building and testing, all in good time.
So here’s to the changes, both big and small,
A leap for our project, we celebrate all! 🎉


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Welcome to Codecov 🎉

Once you merge this PR into your default branch, you're all set! Codecov will compare coverage reports and display results in all future pull requests.

Thanks for integrating Codecov - We've got you covered ☂️

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 25

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (19)
simapp/Makefile (2)

4-13: Consider adding error handling for git commands.

While the version determination logic is sound, it might be helpful to add error handling for environments where git commands might fail (e.g., shallow clones in CI).

 ifeq (,$(VERSION))
-  VERSION := $(shell git describe --exact-match 2>/dev/null)
+  VERSION := $(shell git describe --exact-match 2>/dev/null || echo "unknown")
   ifeq (,$(VERSION))
     ifeq ($(shell git status --porcelain),)
     	VERSION := $(BRANCH)
     else
     	VERSION := $(BRANCH)-dirty
     endif
   endif
 endif

23-28: Add documentation for build flags and consider adding build directory creation.

The build target looks good but could benefit from two improvements:

  1. Add a comment explaining the build flags, especially the 'ledger' tag
  2. Ensure the build directory exists before building
 BUILD_FLAGS := -ldflags '$(ldflags)' -tags 'ledger'

+# build: Builds the simd binary with ledger support
 build:
+	@mkdir -p $(PWD)/build/
 	@go build $(BUILD_FLAGS) -o $(PWD)/build/ ./...

 .PHONY: build
client/cli/tx.go (1)

28-40: Consider enhancing the command description.

While the command structure is correct, consider adding a more detailed description to help users understand the purpose and impact of the module's transactions.

 cmd := &cobra.Command{
 	Use:                        types.ModuleName,
-	Short:                      fmt.Sprintf("Transactions commands for the %s module", types.ModuleName),
+	Short:                      fmt.Sprintf("%s module transaction subcommands", types.ModuleName),
+	Long:                       fmt.Sprintf(`Transaction subcommands for the %s module. These commands allow updating global fee parameters, including gas prices for the network.`, types.ModuleName),
 	DisableFlagParsing:         false,
 	SuggestionsMinimumDistance: 2,
 	RunE:                       client.ValidateCmd,
 }
ante.go (2)

44-45: Document the bypass behavior

The early return with zero fees when all messages can bypass fees should be documented for clarity.

Add a comment explaining this behavior:

+// If all messages in the transaction can bypass fees, return early with zero fees
 if allBypassMessages {
     return sdk.Coins{}, 0, nil
 }

48-54: Improve error handling for required fees

The error handling for GetRequiredFees is good, but the early return for empty required fees could benefit from more context.

Consider adding more context to the error handling:

 requiredFees, err := keeper.GetRequiredFees(ctx, feeTx)
 if err != nil {
-    return nil, 0, err
+    return nil, 0, errors.Wrap(err, "failed to get required fees")
 }
+// If no required fees are set, allow the transaction to proceed
 if len(requiredFees) == 0 {
     return sdk.Coins{}, 0, nil
 }
.github/workflows/e2e-tests.yaml (1)

24-24: Consider pinning the platform version.

For better reproducibility, consider explicitly pinning the platform version:

-  platform: linux/amd64 # test runner architecture only
+  platform: linux/amd64@v8 # test runner architecture only
e2e/setup.go (1)

31-34: Add documentation for the exported ChainWrapper type.

Since ChainWrapper is an exported type, it should have a documentation comment explaining its purpose and fields.

+// ChainWrapper encapsulates a Cosmos chain and its associated authority wallet
+// for end-to-end testing purposes.
 type ChainWrapper struct {
+    // Chain represents the Cosmos chain instance
     Chain     *cosmos.CosmosChain
+    // Authority represents the wallet with administrative privileges
     Authority ibc.Wallet
 }
e2e/globalfee_test.go (3)

15-16: Add package documentation.

Consider adding a package-level documentation comment to describe the purpose and scope of the e2e test package.

 package e2e
+
+// Package e2e contains end-to-end tests that validate the global fee functionality
+// by simulating real-world scenarios using a test chain.

30-38: Add test documentation and consider using constants.

The test setup could be improved with documentation and constants for better maintainability.

+// TestGlobalFee validates the global fee functionality by testing:
+// - Transaction execution without fees
+// - Gas price updates
+// - Fee requirements enforcement
+// - Bypass message functionality
 func TestGlobalFee(t *testing.T) {
 	ctx, wrapper := GlobalFeeSuite(t)
 	validator := wrapper.Chain.Validators[0]
 
+	const (
+		defaultGas = 200_000
+		gasDenom   = "ustake"
+		gasAmount  = 10
+	)
+
 	var (
-		gasPrice = sdk.DecCoin{Denom: "ustake", Amount: math.LegacyNewDec(10)}
-		gas      = math.NewInt(200_000) // default gas
+		gasPrice = sdk.DecCoin{Denom: gasDenom, Amount: math.LegacyNewDec(gasAmount)}
+		gas      = math.NewInt(defaultGas)
 		fee      = fmt.Sprintf("%sustake", gasPrice.Amount.MulInt(gas).String())
 	)

40-43: Make the funding amount more explicit.

Consider using a named constant for the funding amount to improve readability and maintainability.

+	const initialFunding = 100_000_000_000 // 100K tokens
+
 	// ARRANGE: Generate a sender and recipient wallet.
-	sender := interchaintest.GetAndFundTestUsers(t, ctx, "sender", math.NewInt(100_000_000_000), wrapper.Chain)[0]
+	sender := interchaintest.GetAndFundTestUsers(t, ctx, "sender", math.NewInt(initialFunding), wrapper.Chain)[0]
module.go (1)

146-148: Track the temporary DecCoins parsing workaround.

The TODO comment indicates a temporary workaround for DecCoins parsing issues. This should be tracked and addressed once the Cosmos SDK team provides feedback.

Would you like me to create a GitHub issue to track this technical debt and follow up with the Cosmos SDK team?

go.mod (1)

Line range hint 3-3: Incorrect Go version specified

The Go version 1.22.7 appears to be incorrect as the latest Go 1.22.x release is 1.22.1. This could cause compatibility issues.

Apply this diff to fix the Go version:

-go 1.22.7
+go 1.22.1
simapp/export.go (2)

47-50: Consider using json.Marshal instead of json.MarshalIndent for efficiency

Using json.MarshalIndent adds extra whitespace for readability but is less efficient than json.Marshal. If the indented output is not necessary, consider using json.Marshal for better performance.

Apply this diff if indentation is not required:

-	appState, err := json.MarshalIndent(genState, "", "  ")
+	appState, err := json.Marshal(genState)

27-31: Remove unused parameters jailAllowedAddrs and modulesToExport

The parameters jailAllowedAddrs and modulesToExport are not used within the function. Removing unused parameters improves code clarity and maintainability.

Apply this diff to remove the unused parameters:

-func (app *SimApp) ExportAppStateAndValidators(
-	forZeroHeight bool,
-	jailAllowedAddrs []string,
-	modulesToExport []string,
-) (servertypes.ExportedApp, error) {
+func (app *SimApp) ExportAppStateAndValidators(
+	forZeroHeight bool,
+) (servertypes.ExportedApp, error) {
simapp/simd/cmd/commands.go (1)

1-14: Update the License Header Year

The license header specifies the year as 2024. Ensure that the year reflects the actual creation or current year to maintain accuracy.

simapp/app.go (1)

73-89: Add documentation comments to the exported SimApp struct.

Including GoDoc comments for the SimApp struct will enhance code readability and help other developers understand its purpose and usage.

simapp/simd/cmd/root.go (3)

89-90: Typographical error in comment.

There is a typo in the comment on line 90. The word "ets" should be corrected to "sets" for clarity.

Apply this diff to fix the typo:

- // This needs to go after ReadFromClientConfig, as that function ets the RPC client needed for SIGN_MODE_TEXTUAL.
+ // This needs to go after ReadFromClientConfig, as that function sets the RPC client needed for SIGN_MODE_TEXTUAL.

122-142: Add documentation comment for 'ProvideClientContext' function.

It's recommended to include a function comment for the exported function ProvideClientContext to enhance code readability and maintainability.

Apply this diff to add the documentation comment:

+// ProvideClientContext constructs and returns a configured client.Context.
 func ProvideClientContext(
     appCodec codec.Codec,
     interfaceRegistry codectypes.InterfaceRegistry,
     txConfig client.TxConfig,
     legacyAmino *codec.LegacyAmino,
 ) client.Context {
     // function body...

139-139: Consider handling the error returned by 'config.ReadFromClientConfig'.

Currently, the error returned by config.ReadFromClientConfig is ignored. Handling this error can prevent potential issues if the client configuration cannot be read properly.

Apply this diff to handle the error:

-	clientCtx, _ = config.ReadFromClientConfig(clientCtx)
+	var err error
+	clientCtx, err = config.ReadFromClientConfig(clientCtx)
+	if err != nil {
+	    // Handle the error appropriately, e.g., log the error or return a default client context.
+	}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6a67d80 and 3789b2c.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (4)
  • e2e/go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
  • go.work is excluded by !**/*.work
  • go.work.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
  • simapp/go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (20)
  • .github/workflows/e2e-tests.yaml (1 hunks)
  • .gitignore (1 hunks)
  • Makefile (2 hunks)
  • ante.go (1 hunks)
  • client/cli/tx.go (1 hunks)
  • e2e/chains.yaml (1 hunks)
  • e2e/globalfee_test.go (1 hunks)
  • e2e/go.mod (1 hunks)
  • e2e/setup.go (1 hunks)
  • e2e/utils.go (1 hunks)
  • go.mod (1 hunks)
  • module.go (4 hunks)
  • simapp/Makefile (1 hunks)
  • simapp/app.go (1 hunks)
  • simapp/app.yaml (1 hunks)
  • simapp/export.go (1 hunks)
  • simapp/go.mod (1 hunks)
  • simapp/simd/cmd/commands.go (1 hunks)
  • simapp/simd/cmd/root.go (1 hunks)
  • simapp/simd/main.go (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
  • .gitignore
  • e2e/go.mod
  • simapp/go.mod
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint
.github/workflows/e2e-tests.yaml

56-56: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:3:27: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)

🪛 yamllint
.github/workflows/e2e-tests.yaml

[error] 60-60: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

🪛 Gitleaks
simapp/app.yaml

48-48: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)


55-55: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)

🔇 Additional comments (34)
e2e/chains.yaml (1)

1-6: LGTM! The chain configuration is well-structured.

The YAML configuration follows the correct format and includes all necessary fields for the e2e test chain setup:

  • Chain name is descriptive and matches the project
  • Build configuration is properly specified
  • Binary path is clearly defined
simapp/Makefile (2)

1-2: LGTM: Git information extraction is properly implemented.

The implementation correctly extracts the branch name and commit hash using appropriate git commands.


15-21: Verify the LDFLAGS configuration across different environments.

The LDFLAGS configuration looks correct, but we should verify the paths are consistent across different build environments.

✅ Verification successful

LDFLAGS configuration is correctly set and consistent

The verification confirms that:

  • The cosmos-sdk dependency is properly defined in go.mod
  • The LDFLAGS configuration in simapp/Makefile correctly references the cosmos-sdk/version package
  • The version-related linker flags are consistently set for all required fields (Name, AppName, Version, Commit, BuildTags)
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the module path exists and is consistent
# Test: Check if the specified module paths exist in go.mod
rg -l "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/version" --type go

Length of output: 54


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's first check if go.mod exists and contains cosmos-sdk dependency
cat go.mod

# Also check for any Makefile references to cosmos-sdk
rg "cosmos-sdk" --type make

# Check the entire codebase for cosmos-sdk/version imports or references
rg "cosmos-sdk/version"

Length of output: 15858

e2e/utils.go (2)

1-14: LGTM: License header is properly formatted.


15-24: LGTM: Package and imports are well-organized.

simapp/app.yaml (4)

13-22: LGTM! Auth module configuration is properly structured.

The bech32 prefix and module account permissions are correctly configured for the Noble network and staking operations.


23-27: LGTM! Bank module implements proper security controls.

The configuration correctly blocks sensitive module accounts from receiving funds, following security best practices.


28-42: LGTM! Standard modules are properly configured.

The basic modules use appropriate type configurations from the Cosmos SDK.


1-12: LGTM! Runtime configuration follows best practices.

The module configuration follows Cosmos SDK conventions with proper execution order and initialization sequence.

Let's verify the module dependencies to ensure the execution order is correct:

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more specific information about the module dependencies and initialization order.


Let me check one more aspect to verify the module dependencies and ordering specifically in the app configuration.


Based on the gathered information, I can now generate the final response:

✅ Module ordering in app.yaml is correctly configured

The module execution order in the configuration is properly structured:

  • Pre-blockers: upgrade runs first, which is correct as it needs to handle any pending upgrades before other operations
  • Begin/End blockers: staking module's placement is appropriate as it handles validator set changes
  • Genesis initialization order is correct, following module dependencies:
    1. auth (accounts) → bank (balances) → staking (validators)
    2. Followed by supporting modules: globalfee, genutil, params, upgrade

The configuration aligns with the module dependencies found in the codebase and follows Cosmos SDK's recommended practices for module ordering.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify module dependencies in Go files
# Look for module initialization and dependency declarations

# Search for module registration and dependencies
rg -A 5 "NewKeeper|RegisterServices|InitGenesis" 

Length of output: 2500


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for staking module dependencies and initialization
rg -A 5 "staking.*Keeper|staking.*InitGenesis" 

# Search for upgrade module dependencies
rg -A 5 "upgrade.*Keeper|upgrade.*InitGenesis"

# Look for module initialization order in main app setup
rg -A 10 "NewApp|app\.Name|SetOrder" 

Length of output: 2466


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Look for module configuration and dependencies in YAML files
fd -e yaml -x cat {} \;

# Search for module initialization sequence in Go files
rg -A 10 "ModuleManager|BasicManager|OrderInitGenesis|OrderBeginBlockers|OrderEndBlockers"

Length of output: 6234

simapp/simd/main.go (3)

1-26: LGTM: Well-structured file header and imports.

The license header is properly formatted, and imports are organized with clear separation between standard library and external packages.


42-48: LGTM: Proper SDK configuration setup.

The configuration setup follows Cosmos SDK best practices by properly initializing and sealing the config to prevent further modifications.


49-54: Verify DefaultNodeHome path and document Execute parameters.

The implementation looks correct, but there are two points to consider:

  1. Verify that simapp.DefaultNodeHome is properly defined and accessible
  2. Document the purpose of the empty string parameter in svrcmd.Execute()

Let's verify the DefaultNodeHome configuration:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check DefaultNodeHome definition and usage
echo "Searching for DefaultNodeHome definition..."
rg "DefaultNodeHome.*=" || echo "DefaultNodeHome definition not found"

echo "Checking for other usages of Execute with empty string..."
ast-grep --pattern 'svrcmd.Execute($_, "", $_)'
client/cli/tx.go (2)

1-16: LGTM: License header and package declaration are properly structured.


17-26: LGTM: Imports are properly structured and from trusted sources.

ante.go (1)

35-66: Verify test coverage and usage

The changes to TxFeeChecker introduce new logic paths that should be thoroughly tested.

Let's verify the test coverage and usage:

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information about the test coverage and implementation details.


Based on the results, I can now generate the final response since I have sufficient information about the test coverage and implementation:

Test coverage for bypass logic is adequate

The bypass message functionality is well-tested with:

  • Unit tests in keeper/query_server_test.go covering bypass message queries
  • Unit tests in keeper/msg_server_test.go covering bypass message updates
  • E2E tests in e2e/globalfee_test.go verifying bypass message behavior
  • Implementation is properly integrated in ante.go with TxFeeChecker being the single point of fee checking
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for test coverage of the new bypass logic
rg -l "TestTxFeeChecker|TestBypassMessages" --type go

# Check for all usages of TxFeeChecker to ensure compatibility
ast-grep --pattern 'TxFeeChecker($$$)'

Length of output: 124


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of the test file to understand coverage
cat keeper/query_server_test.go

# Look for any bypass message related tests or implementation
rg "BypassMessages" --type go -A 5

# Search for fee checker related implementations
rg "TxFeeChecker" --type go -A 5

Length of output: 135618

.github/workflows/e2e-tests.yaml (1)

6-9: Add explicit permissions for security.

Define explicit permissions to follow the principle of least privilege:
[security]

 env:
   TAR_PATH: docker-image.tar
   ARTIFACT_NAME: tar-docker-image
+
+permissions:
+  contents: read
+  checks: write
+  pull-requests: read
Makefile (3)

1-2: LGTM: Well-structured target declarations

The new targets are properly declared as PHONY and integrated into the all target in a logical sequence.


65-68: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add prerequisite checks and error handling for image build

The local-image target could be more robust with additional checks.

Let's verify the required files and configuration:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if e2e/chains.yaml exists and contains the required chain
if [ -f e2e/chains.yaml ]; then
    echo "Checking e2e/chains.yaml for noble-globalfee-simd configuration:"
    grep -A 5 "noble-globalfee-simd" e2e/chains.yaml
else
    echo "Warning: e2e/chains.yaml not found"
fi

Consider adding these improvements:

 local-image:
 	@echo "🤖 Building image..."
+	@which heighliner > /dev/null 2>&1 || { echo "❌ heighliner not installed"; exit 1; }
+	@test -f ./e2e/chains.yaml || { echo "❌ e2e/chains.yaml not found"; exit 1; }
 	@heighliner build --file ./e2e/chains.yaml --chain noble-globalfee-simd --local
 	@echo "✅ Completed build!"

8-11: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider improving build error handling and visibility

The current build implementation has some potential issues:

  1. Only stdout is redirected to /dev/null, leaving stderr visible
  2. No error checking after the build command
  3. Build details are hidden in simapp/Makefile

Let's verify the simapp Makefile exists and check its build target:

Consider this improved implementation:

 build:
 	@echo "🤖 Building simd..."
-	@cd simapp && make build 1> /dev/null
+	@cd simapp && make build > /dev/null 2>&1 || { echo "❌ Build failed!"; exit 1; }
 	@echo "✅ Completed build!"
e2e/setup.go (2)

1-29: LGTM: License and imports are properly structured.

The license header is complete, and imports are well-organized following Go conventions.


92-103: ⚠️ Potential issue

Improve security and configuration of authority setup.

Several security and maintainability concerns need to be addressed:

  1. Hard-coded mnemonic phrase in the code
  2. Fixed initial balance
  3. Missing function documentation

Let's verify if this mnemonic is used elsewhere:

Apply these improvements:

+// preGenAuthority returns a function that sets up the authority wallet and
+// its initial balance for the test chain. This should only be used in tests.
 func preGenAuthority(ctx context.Context, wrapper *ChainWrapper) func(ibc.Chain) error {
     return func(chain ibc.Chain) (err error) {
         validator := wrapper.Chain.Validators[0]
 
+        // TODO: Consider moving this to a test configuration file
+        const testMnemonic = "usual parade country forward clerk group ripple dust upset sun spike dish business foster lawn jealous panther junior kite sail erosion bean armed soup"
-        wrapper.Authority, err = validator.Chain.BuildWallet(ctx, "authority", "usual parade country forward clerk group ripple dust upset sun spike dish business foster lawn jealous panther junior kite sail erosion bean armed soup")
+        wrapper.Authority, err = validator.Chain.BuildWallet(ctx, "authority", testMnemonic)
         if err != nil {
-            return err
+            return fmt.Errorf("failed to build authority wallet: %w", err)
         }
 
-        return validator.AddGenesisAccount(ctx, wrapper.Authority.FormattedAddress(), []sdk.Coin{sdk.NewCoin(chain.Config().Denom, math.NewInt(10000000))})
+        initialBalance := math.NewInt(10000000)
+        coins := []sdk.Coin{sdk.NewCoin(chain.Config().Denom, initialBalance)}
+        if err := validator.AddGenesisAccount(ctx, wrapper.Authority.FormattedAddress(), coins); err != nil {
+            return fmt.Errorf("failed to add genesis account: %w", err)
+        }
+        return nil
     }
 }
e2e/globalfee_test.go (1)

30-30: Verify test coverage and parallel test safety.

Please ensure:

  1. This test is included in the CI workflow's test coverage report
  2. The test is safe to run in parallel with other tests (if t.Parallel() is added)
✅ Verification successful

Let's search more broadly for test configurations and examine the actual test file content to better understand the test setup and potential parallel execution concerns.


Test coverage and parallel safety verified

  1. The test is properly included in the CI workflow's test coverage as evidenced by:

    • Test is executed via test-e2e target in Makefile
    • E2E tests are run with race detection (-race flag) and proper timeout
    • Tests are executed in CI through .github/workflows/e2e-tests.yaml
  2. Regarding parallel test safety:

    • The test uses isolated test fixtures through GlobalFeeSuite(t)
    • Each test creates its own wallets and validator instances
    • No shared global state is modified between test cases
    • The test is safe to run in parallel, though currently not marked with t.Parallel()
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if the test is included in CI workflow
rg -l "go test.*e2e" .github/workflows/

# Check for other test files that might run in parallel
fd -e go -x grep -l "t.Parallel" {} \; test/

Length of output: 89


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if the test is included in CI workflow with broader search
rg -l "go test" .github/workflows/

# Check test patterns in Makefile or similar
fd "Makefile|\.mk$" -x cat {}

# Look for parallel test patterns in all Go test files
fd -e go -x grep -l "t.Parallel" {}

# Check the test file content for shared resources
cat e2e/globalfee_test.go

Length of output: 7311

module.go (3)

36-36: LGTM: Required imports for CLI functionality.

The new imports are necessary for implementing the CLI commands and align with the module's enhanced functionality.

Also applies to: 39-39


153-153: LGTM: Well-documented CLI command configuration.

The example provides clear guidance for the UpdateBypassMessages command, and the EnhanceCustomCommand flag appropriately supports the custom implementation.

Also applies to: 162-162


180-182: LGTM: Clean implementation of GetTxCmd.

The method properly delegates to the cli package, maintaining good separation of concerns.

go.mod (1)

20-20: LGTM: Cobra dependency addition

Adding github.com/spf13/cobra v1.8.1 as a direct dependency is appropriate for implementing the CLI functionality mentioned in the PR objectives. The version used is the latest stable release.

simapp/simd/cmd/commands.go (4)

126-175: ⚠️ Potential issue

Ensure Consistent Handling of appOpts Type Assertion

In the appExport function, the type assertion of appOpts to *viper.Viper might fail if appOpts is not of that type. Ensure that appOpts is consistently of the expected type throughout the application.

Run the following script to check where appOpts is instantiated and ensure it is a *viper.Viper:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the type of appOpts throughout the codebase

# Search for instantiations of appOpts
rg -A 2 'var.*appOpts.*servertypes.AppOptions'

126-175: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Simplify Conditional Logic in appExport Function

The conditional checks within the appExport function can be simplified for better readability.

Consider refactoring the conditionals as follows:

 if height != -1 {
     app, err = simapp.NewSimApp(logger, db, traceStore, false, appOpts)
     if err != nil {
         return servertypes.ExportedApp{}, err
     }

     if err := app.LoadHeight(height); err != nil {
         return servertypes.ExportedApp{}, err
     }
 } else {
-    app, err = simapp.NewSimApp(logger, db, traceStore, true, appOpts)
+    app, err = simapp.NewSimApp(logger, db, traceStore, false, appOpts)
     if err != nil {
         return servertypes.ExportedApp{}, err
     }
 }

Likely invalid or redundant comment.


115-124: ⚠️ Potential issue

Handle Potential Nil Application Return

In the newApp function, if an error occurs and panic(err) is invoked, it may not provide enough context. Consider returning nil and allowing the caller to handle the error appropriately.

Apply this diff to return nil and log the error:

 func newApp(logger log.Logger, db dbm.DB, traceStore io.Writer, appOpts servertypes.AppOptions) servertypes.Application {
     baseappOptions := server.DefaultBaseappOptions(appOpts)
     app, err := simapp.NewSimApp(logger, db, traceStore, true, appOpts, baseappOptions...)
     if err != nil {
-        panic(err)
+        logger.Error("Failed to create a new SimApp instance", "error", err)
+        return nil
     }

     return app
 }

Likely invalid or redundant comment.


43-67: Ensure cfg.Seal() is Called After Setting Bech32 Prefixes

The cfg.Seal() method seals the configuration to prevent further modifications. Ensure that all necessary configurations, such as setting Bech32 prefixes, are done before calling cfg.Seal().

Run the following script to check if Bech32 prefixes are set before sealing:

simapp/app.go (3)

1-14: License header is correctly included.

The Apache License, Version 2.0 header is properly added at the top of the file.


185-194: kvStoreKeys method is well-implemented.

The method correctly collects and returns the KV store keys from the application.


155-165: Verify the configuration of the AnteHandler.

Ensure that the anteHandler is properly configured with the correct TxFeeChecker and that all necessary modules are accounted for in transaction processing.

Run the following script to confirm that TxFeeChecker is implemented correctly and used consistently throughout the codebase:

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information about the TxFeeChecker implementation and usage.


Let me gather more information about the TxFeeChecker implementation specifically.


Based on the comprehensive analysis of the codebase, I can now provide a final response about the AnteHandler configuration.

The AnteHandler is properly configured with a well-implemented TxFeeChecker.

The TxFeeChecker implementation in the globalfee module:

  • Correctly handles fee validation for transactions
  • Implements bypass message support for specific message types
  • Properly validates required fees against transaction fees
  • Includes appropriate error handling for insufficient fees
  • Integrates with the GlobalFeeKeeper for fee requirements
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify usage of globalfee.TxFeeChecker in AnteHandler setup.

# Test: Search for all instances where TxFeeChecker is used.
rg -A 3 'ante.NewAnteHandler\('

Length of output: 275


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for TxFeeChecker implementation and usage
rg -A 5 "TxFeeChecker"

# Search for globalfee package imports and usage
rg -A 3 "globalfee"

# Look for any other ante handler configurations
ast-grep --pattern 'func NewAnteHandler($$$) ($_, $_) {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 99976


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Look for the TxFeeChecker implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'func TxFeeChecker($$$) ante.TxFeeChecker {
  $$$
}'

# Search for any tests related to TxFeeChecker
rg -A 5 "Test.*TxFeeChecker"

Length of output: 1719

simapp/simd/cmd/root.go (1)

105-107: Verify security implications of enabling the API server.

Enabling the API server with srvCfg.API.Enable = true may expose the application to external requests. Ensure that appropriate security measures, such as authentication and authorization, are implemented to protect against unauthorized access.

Please review the security configuration and consider implementing safeguards if necessary.

e2e/chains.yaml Show resolved Hide resolved
e2e/utils.go Show resolved Hide resolved
e2e/utils.go Show resolved Hide resolved
simapp/app.yaml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
simapp/simd/main.go Show resolved Hide resolved
simapp/simd/cmd/commands.go Show resolved Hide resolved
simapp/app.go Show resolved Hide resolved
simapp/app.go Show resolved Hide resolved
simapp/simd/cmd/root.go Show resolved Hide resolved
simapp/simd/cmd/root.go Show resolved Hide resolved
@johnletey johnletey changed the title feat: Add simapp, e2e test, and CI workflow feat: add simulation app, implement e2e tests Oct 31, 2024
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3789b2c and 432c504.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • .gitignore (1 hunks)
  • client/cli/tx.go (1 hunks)
  • e2e/globalfee_test.go (1 hunks)
  • module.go (4 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
  • .gitignore
  • e2e/globalfee_test.go
  • module.go

client/cli/tx.go Show resolved Hide resolved
@johnletey johnletey merged commit 495e921 into main Oct 31, 2024
4 checks passed
@johnletey johnletey deleted the dan/simd+e2e branch October 31, 2024 10:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants