-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 87
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix/acer temp #256
Fix/acer temp #256
Conversation
… RECONR if we have processed MF12 sections (LO=1 only)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me. Coupled with Romano's positive feedback I'd say this is complete. But let's keep JCS's caution in mind for other NJOY modules (e.g., GROUPR, THERMR, ...). This isn't the first time a multi-temperature pendf has confused downstream NJOY modules.
@kahlerac Yes, I'll keep an eye out. Due to the previous merge, there's a conflict so I'll fix that and merge. |
@kahlerac You'll have to press the accept button again |
@kahlerac Sorry, I meant you need to reapprove this. |
Fixes #250