Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Photoatomic data processing fails in ACER #91

Closed
whaeck opened this issue Jun 25, 2018 · 0 comments
Closed

Photoatomic data processing fails in ACER #91

whaeck opened this issue Jun 25, 2018 · 0 comments
Assignees

Comments

@whaeck
Copy link
Member

whaeck commented Jun 25, 2018

NJOY 2016 fails in ACER when using the following input file for processing photoatomic data from ENDF/B-VII.1:

acer
31 32 0 33 34
4/
'Uranium Photoatomic data'/
9200/
stop

Tape31 is the photoatomic ENDF file and tape32 is the atomic relaxation ENDF file. as downloaded from the NNDC website.

The following error is reported:

 njoy 2016.37  12Jun18                                       06/25/18 10:38:55
 *****************************************************************************

 acer...                                                                  0.0s
At line 852 of file /home/wim/Projects/NJOY2016/njoy2016/src/endf.f90 (unit = 32, file = 'fort.32')
Fortran runtime error: End of file

Error termination. Backtrace:
#0  0x7f08bf6d0377 in read_sf
	at /home/wim/Temp/gcc-6.4/libgfortran/io/transfer.c:368
#1  0x7f08bf6d1344 in formatted_transfer_scalar_read
	at /home/wim/Temp/gcc-6.4/libgfortran/io/transfer.c:1375
#2  0x7f08bf6d1344 in formatted_transfer
	at /home/wim/Temp/gcc-6.4/libgfortran/io/transfer.c:1995
#3  0x7f08bfb10e0d in lineio
	at /home/wim/Projects/NJOY2016/njoy2016/src/endf.f90:852
#4  0x7f08bfb16725 in __endf_MOD_moreio
	at /home/wim/Projects/NJOY2016/njoy2016/src/endf.f90:449
#5  0x7f08bfa479b1 in alax
	at /home/wim/Projects/NJOY2016/njoy2016/src/acepa.f90:548
#6  0x7f08bfa4ede6 in __acepa_MOD_acepho
	at /home/wim/Projects/NJOY2016/njoy2016/src/acepa.f90:241
#7  0x7f08bfa89358 in __acem_MOD_acer
	at /home/wim/Projects/NJOY2016/njoy2016/src/acer.f90:440
#8  0x401c58 in njoy
	at /home/wim/Projects/NJOY2016/njoy2016/src/main.f90:238
#9  0x401e42 in main
	at /home/wim/Projects/NJOY2016/njoy2016/src/main.f90:112

Program received signal SIGSEGV: Segmentation fault - invalid memory reference.

Backtrace for this error:
#0  0x7f08beb0127f in ???
#1  0x7f08bf6d4305 in sclose
	at /home/wim/Temp/gcc-6.4/libgfortran/io/unix.h:95
#2  0x7f08bf6d4305 in close_unit_1
	at /home/wim/Temp/gcc-6.4/libgfortran/io/unit.c:703
#3  0x7f0910d0c189 in ???
#4  0x7f08beb04b68 in ???
#5  0x7f08beb04bb6 in ???
#6  0x7f08bf6d0377 in read_sf
	at /home/wim/Temp/gcc-6.4/libgfortran/io/transfer.c:368
#7  0x7f08bf6d1344 in formatted_transfer_scalar_read
	at /home/wim/Temp/gcc-6.4/libgfortran/io/transfer.c:1375
#8  0x7f08bf6d1344 in formatted_transfer
	at /home/wim/Temp/gcc-6.4/libgfortran/io/transfer.c:1995
#9  0x7f08bfb10e0d in lineio
	at /home/wim/Projects/NJOY2016/njoy2016/src/endf.f90:852
#10  0x7f08bfb16725 in __endf_MOD_moreio
	at /home/wim/Projects/NJOY2016/njoy2016/src/endf.f90:449
#11  0x7f08bfa479b1 in alax
	at /home/wim/Projects/NJOY2016/njoy2016/src/acepa.f90:548
#12  0x7f08bfa4ede6 in __acepa_MOD_acepho
	at /home/wim/Projects/NJOY2016/njoy2016/src/acepa.f90:241
#13  0x7f08bfa89358 in __acem_MOD_acer
	at /home/wim/Projects/NJOY2016/njoy2016/src/acer.f90:440
#14  0x401c58 in njoy
	at /home/wim/Projects/NJOY2016/njoy2016/src/main.f90:238
#15  0x401e42 in main
	at /home/wim/Projects/NJOY2016/njoy2016/src/main.f90:112
Segmentation fault

Of note: this processes using NJOY99. NJOY2012 fails as well.
If I use ENDF/B-VIII.0 data, all three versions of NJOY fail - maybe due to updates to the ENDF format for these data or array sizes set in the code that are not large enough when processing ENDF/B-VIII.0.

@whaeck whaeck self-assigned this Feb 14, 2019
whaeck added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 28, 2019
…nough to contain data), added error message for future reference
@whaeck whaeck mentioned this issue Oct 29, 2019
@whaeck whaeck closed this as completed Oct 29, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant