-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 677
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix #1093 #1121
Fix #1093 #1121
Conversation
27ad2c0
to
21ed20a
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks good, but could you please add a CHANGELOG entry?
21ed20a
to
d08fe65
Compare
Thank you for the feedback. CHANGELOG modified. |
Looks good now. As soon as PR #1123 is done, you'll be able to rebase this one and the test failures will be fixed. |
Thank you. I'm waiting for PR #1123 now. |
You should be able to rebase now. |
d08fe65
to
9ebc633
Compare
Thank you. The PR is rebased. |
@tathanhdinh the commit log could receive some love, don't you think? I know the issue is detailed but it'd be good if the commit log could be extended with it. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
bors r+
1121: Fix #1093 r=asomers a=tathanhdinh Hello, This PR fixes the problem discovered in #1093. Thanks for any comment. 1130: unistd: getgrouplist: Rework code to use `reserve_double_buffer_size` r=asomers a=otavio The buffer resize logic can be simplified reusing the `reserve_double_buffer_size` method. Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Ta Thanh Dinh <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Otavio Salvador <[email protected]>
Build succeeded
|
Hello,
This PR fixes the problem discovered in #1093.
Thanks for any comment.