-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 51
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Minor coding style fix: lib.getExe instead of ${bin}/bin/bin #391
Conversation
43135c6
to
8d14944
Compare
Looks good. Thanks for this cleanup! One minor thing: can you fix your commit names to match the style of the other commits in the repository? Will merge afterwards! |
@blitz I believe that everything could be squashed into a single commit. (I was a bit too verbose while making the commits). Would it be fine if I squashed everything into a single commit? I am currently away, so I will take care of it ~8h later |
Sure. One commit is fine. 👍 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM modulo commit messages.
Alright, should be fine now |
@blitz is the commit name alright? |
flake: add meta.mainProgram attribute to wrappedTool (lzbt)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for taking the time to do this!
This is a minor change in coding style that removes path references replacing them with
lib.getExe
.This makes executable references less dependent on binary names.
Major advantage: the
cfg.package
option doesn't require the binary name to be "lzbt" anymore.