Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add local dev secret plugin #109

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 4, 2021
Merged

Add local dev secret plugin #109

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 4, 2021

Conversation

tjholm
Copy link
Member

@tjholm tjholm commented Jul 30, 2021

No description provided.

@tjholm tjholm requested review from jyecusch and medgar-nitric July 30, 2021 04:56
@tjholm tjholm force-pushed the feature/secret-local branch 2 times, most recently from 7b22627 to 73908b5 Compare August 2, 2021 00:03
pkg/plugins/secret/dev/dev.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/plugins/secret/dev/dev.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/plugins/secret/dev/dev_test.go Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/plugins/secret/dev/dev.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/plugins/secret/dev/dev_test.go Show resolved Hide resolved
@tjholm tjholm force-pushed the feature/secret-local branch from 6a23f4b to 7cb1b76 Compare August 3, 2021 01:56
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Aug 3, 2021

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@tjholm
Copy link
Member Author

tjholm commented Aug 3, 2021

#114

Has been raised to address secret name validation, in common code. Will be done as a separate PR.

@jyecusch jyecusch merged commit 2da56cc into main Aug 4, 2021
@jyecusch jyecusch deleted the feature/secret-local branch August 4, 2021 04:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants